[Pahuanui]

You keep trying to stray away from the original point. What the hell is wrong with MG telling this punk to stuff his 60's piece BS?

In this case, it boils down to a simple matter of good manners. The original poster took it upon herself to begin a confrontation, and came off like a total ass, first by using leading questions, then by apparantly teeing off on the kids without being provoked.

So they gave historically ignorant replies. So what? Sounds like the pissant was looking for a fight to begin with.

[Dead Dog]

Actually, the little ingrate decided to put a cool, rebellious, anti-American, Anti-social patch on his jacket to pi$$ people off. He has know idea what he is standing up for, and she did the right thing and let him know. I don't see how she overreacted to 9-11 by this, this should have been her reaction with or without 9-11.

She did not start the confrontation, the kid did. The kid has his freedom of speech, he used it, and she has the right to answer back. Her profanity is, IMO, appropriate to the emotions the kid did need to hear. We in the right, have been far too silent for too long, and if 9-11 has changed this then so be it. The 9-11 event should never have been necessary for motivation.