What gets me is this. Tony Blair was completely against military action against Iraq. A visit with Bush turned him around, against the will of his own people and party.
WHY? What proof did Bush show him?
The reason I am for military action is that I believe the administration knows something more than they are telling us. I wish they would tell us, and I wonder why they can't/won't: is it to avoid panic or is it to protect the source?
I really don't think that "He tried to get mah Daddy!" would have been enough to turn Blair around, especially when you see the heat he is taking for his support back home. There is something to this that we don't know.
Thank you for stating the obvious to anyone with a brain. Of course Bush can't show all of his cards to the public. I trust his judgment, especially when he can get Congress to back him on this. There is something sinister regarding Iraq that we don't know. I hope to God we never know it.