[A_perfect_lady]

That's the Israeli side of the story.

My problem with your approach is the hint of circular logic that I find in this statement. Presumably you speak for the truth. So you indicate "My stance is X because X is the truth." And when I offer information that has at least a possibility of truth that does not correspond with X you imply, "It can't be true because it doesn't support X." That is circular. It's like the Scotsman defense.

[Demidog]

No, it's not circular. I never said it couldn't be true. I said it was their version of the story. I then asked you legitimate questions. One of which you had no logical answer and the second of which you didn't answer at all.