Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2002 12:45:30 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mitchell; marron

"The ideal outcome for Russia is exactly the same as that for Saudi Arabia and OPEC, i.e. maintenance of the status quo and the sanctions regime on Iraqi oil. Thus, Russia's opposition to a U.S. invasion of Iraq is completely rational."

Less oil from country "x", country "y's" oil becomes more valuable. This is especially true in a cartel market, where even those outside the cartel cooperate (Russia somewhat, Norway, Mexico)

Sanctions and pipeline bombings easier to do that backroom negotiations at OPEC meetings...I'd bet those can get hairy!

This article is an example of OPEC's effort at the time to change Russian thinking about increasing exports and become stronger against the Iraq war - despite US promises about debt payments and such.

BTW, Fegelhauer (?) at Moscow Times commented later that this was the reason for Putin's strong opposition to the war - though he didn't know at the time of the Al Mada oil voucher list!

This sure is a lonely thread... :)


2 posted on 06/19/2004 2:14:39 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy
20M barrels/day @ $35/barrel = $256 BILLION/year spent on oil. A $10/barrel drop in oil prices saves us $73B/year

The long-term interests of the US dictate that we shift towards nuke power and energy independence

6 posted on 06/29/2004 6:18:39 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson