Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomFriend
She never said that she supported abortion. What she did say was that she didn't think that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. As I recall she was put on the spot with the question.
191 posted on 09/26/2002 3:31:25 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: sweetliberty
If she thinks that it should be overturned, than I have no problem, for that's the right thing to do.
209 posted on 09/26/2002 4:36:18 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty
She never said that she supported abortion. What she did say was that she didn't think that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. As I recall she was put on the spot with the question.

------------------------------------

But it's a little like saying the same thing in effect, isn't it. In logic there is the concept of the obverse. All A are B. The obvers is the tautological no A is non B. The tautology can be stated in the least entrapping form. What I do not here in here statement is strong serious objection to abortion. That's the bottom line. A middle-aged Ph. D. with life experience could be expected to make a more challenging statement.

210 posted on 09/26/2002 4:36:23 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson