Threatening litigation, oops, that crosses the line for me!
kj
Sure, I understand your point. But consider this. Let's say, in our democratic society, the vast majority believes that promoting the sexual abuse of little boys by men is morally abominable (i.e., wrong). So laws are passed preventing the promotion of such. (For instance, we have free speech limitations on promoting violence - and raping little boys, for most, is a form of violence.) If indeed there are laws that say such, or we decide to pass such lawas, and they meet constitutional muster, as decided by the Supreme Court, then I say, use every legal means to stop the promotion of sexual violence against little boys. Bravo to the people trying to do this.