[Cicero]

Plus I assume that the trial lawyers kicked into Davis's campaign fund. A lot of them were hoping that guns would be the next tobacco, off of which they made billions of dollars in legal fees. But in spite of this move by Davis I think that tide has turned. It seems to me as a legal amateur that the constitutionality of this new law is doubtful, because it amounts to a wrongful and discriminatory taking away of property from the gun manufacturers.

[Carry_Okie]

Would a trial lawyer be liable for bringing an action after being notified of the clearly unconstitutional nature of the ennabling statute?

[wardaddy]

I agree with everything you said....except the tide turning thing. Our foes are still there, it's just that politics and war are not on their side at the moment. They'll be back. Our biggest opponent is continuing urbanization....always has been. Women voters too....my apologies to women who vote otherwise.

[Marauder]

It seems to me ... that the constitutionality of this new law is doubtful

It's another assault on the Constitution, something which has failed to impede politicians, or even break their stride, for too damned long.

Davis and his comrades are fully aware of its doubtful constitutionality, but they don't care.