We're about to go to war with Iraq, and the best justification we've got is that they have the potential to manufacture weapons of mass destruction. The fact that we have historically been a supplier of the materials necessary to create that potentiality is hardly bogus. As a matter of fact, it is highly relevant. Your attempt to cover it up by calling names and obfuscating is highly unethical, but not surprising. No matter how much dirt you try to shovel over the truth, it is coming out - one way or another. People are going to know, and they are going to know who tried to pull one over on them.
Rubbish. They have all these germs in the Middle East, and then some. It's utterly bogus. The libs and the peaceniks are absolutely desperate, and there's no limit to the lies and diostortions they'll use to push their swill on an unsuspecting public. Here we have a case in point.
This story has absolutely nothing to do with Saddam violating the ceasefire agreements he made in 1991. Whether we gave Hussein weapons in the 1980s is irrelevant. He agreed to get rid of all he had in 1991. Has he done that? No. Has he violated the terms in which he agreed to in 1991? Yes. Therefore we have justification to resume the war. And to top that, Bush doesn't need approval from congress either.
Providing cultures for agricultural research is a far step from genetically altering, weaponizing and manufacturing bio-warfare materials in quantity.
Might as well trash the USA for shipping scrap iron to Japan prior to WW II "because they could build tanks out of it."