[Vidalia]

OK, Just a coupla real blunt, no psycho babble points like these to answer your deep thought questions:

..."Sounds like you're a typical "conservative"...

- Sorry to disappoint you, for I am not a typical "anything", but you have an idea what typical means from one statement, therefore, you are narrow minded and highly misinformed.

... I find it peculiar that you espouse a related type of collectivism, nationalism, to combat socialism. Socialists speak for "society" and play divide and conquer class warfare games, and you speak for "America" and play divide and conquer nations-at-war games..."

- What is the difference between "collectivism", "nationalism", and "socialism"?

How long did it take you to learn "Rhetorical Circulism", that being the capability to use mindless run-on sentences with rhetorical linguistics that mean the same thing and end up in a paragraphical void?

The rest of your "canned tirade" is neither relevant nor valuable.

By the way, who infrmed you that GW Bush and this administration were ever coming after your guns?

You are a militia-borne poster, you make it obvious.

[missileboy]

No use replying about the collectivism question lest I speak more psycho babble. I guess blatant inflammatory posts talking about fecal matter, narrow mindedness and grammar critiques are to be the norm.

Who informed you that the Bush Administration was "pro-gun"?

If I'm guilty of labeling you "typical", you are three times as guilty for your mischaracterizating me as a militia-borne poster. Doesn't even come close to fitting the bill - I'm not even a good shot, and the few weapons I own aren't much to speak of.