Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHERE DID THE CONSTITUTION GO? Here are some answers. (IMPORTANT!)
The Aware Group ^ | 22 Sep 02 | Howard Freeman

Posted on 09/22/2002 7:21:03 AM PDT by 11B3

When I beat the IRS, I used Supreme Court decisions. If I had tried to use these in court, I would have been convicted.

I was involved with a patriot group and I studied supreme Court cases. I concluded that the supreme Court had declared that I was not a person required to file an income tax--that the tax was an excise tax on privileges granted by government. So I quit filing and paying income taxes, it was not long before they came down on me with a heavy hand. They issued a notice of deficiency, which had such a fantastic sum on it that the biggest temptation was to go in with their letter and say, "Where in the world did you ever get that figure?" They claimed I owed them some $60,000. But even if I had been paying taxes, I never had that much money, so how could I have owed them that much?

(Excerpt) Read more at theawaregroup.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Free Republic; Government
KEYWORDS: ucc; usainc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: B4Ranch
Sent them an email, thanks.
21 posted on 09/23/2002 6:51:42 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Humpty-Dumpty

Your successful effort in proving you are an expert on very fat things that fall off walls reinforces everyones opinion of you.

22 posted on 09/23/2002 7:46:25 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Don't you even check your sources? Posting incorrect references it just reduces your credibility.
23 posted on 09/23/2002 7:58:20 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Delightful! I read it through for probably the 20'th time in my life. Thanks.
yoe
24 posted on 09/23/2002 9:08:22 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Don't you even check your sources? Posting incorrect references it just reduces your credibility.

You corrected me to impress other readers that you are more knowledgeable than I am. If your efforts were to make me more credible, you would have emailed me in private.

Dumb people are impressed with mastery of detail and find it very important. Smart people are impressed with the mastery of strategic thinking. It is the prime difference between smart and dumb people and their perception as to who is credible and who is not.

In the future perhaps you should confine yourself to impressing dumb people. I'll bet you are very good at it.

25 posted on 09/23/2002 9:24:16 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Would you like some Brie with that whine?

I will complement you in public when you deserve it. So far you seem only to be angry that I pointed out your ignorance.

26 posted on 09/23/2002 9:41:26 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: boris

I work in the Graybar building in New York. Am I in trouble?

27 posted on 09/23/2002 9:49:15 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
http://www.libertysoft.com/liberty/features/54black.html
28 posted on 09/23/2002 12:34:05 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
"White Man's Ghost Dance'

Perhaps a very apt metaphor. Sad, if the metaphor is 'true'.

29 posted on 09/23/2002 12:48:06 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Never mind what words like "Sovereign Citizen" or "Lawful Money" mean -- what does "abracadabra" mean? -- it's what they do that counts. Unfortunately, Constitutionalist words don't do anything but lose court cases and invite sanctions. Constitutionalism is the white man's version of the Ghost Dance. Believing you are invulnerable to bullets puts you in more, not less, danger of being shot.

30 posted on 09/23/2002 12:53:37 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Yes, certainly a striking metaphor. I like it for that reason alone!

I have no illusion that I am bulletproof. ;^)
31 posted on 09/23/2002 12:55:52 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: inquest
But when they start getting into these dogmas such as "The Constitution only recognizes laws that involve an injured party, and that don't compel performance" or some such, when anyone the least bit conversant with American history knows that to be utterly false, I just can't give them any credibility.

Rational thought has been known to impair one's ability to accept this sort of thing ;)

32 posted on 09/23/2002 1:00:16 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
I hope this guy has a Sam's Club membership. That way he can get the tin foil he needs so much of by the case, cheap.
33 posted on 09/23/2002 1:02:40 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Has that been my problem? Tpaine advised me to get help, I guess that's what he was referring to.
34 posted on 09/23/2002 6:58:37 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Such simple, irrefutable common sense, Tator. Now let's see how many understand it.
35 posted on 09/23/2002 7:10:42 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
A Harvard educated lawwer once told me that the common law was dead. She was wrong. So is this vapid author you link.
36 posted on 09/23/2002 7:58:22 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
It's as good as dead to delusional ignoramuses who read all manner of nonsense into it. You know, like claiming that the "common law" exempts "white couples" from marriage licenses.
37 posted on 09/24/2002 1:01:39 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
>But the law is what ever the judges say it is.<

BINGO! We have a winner!

Eyes
38 posted on 09/24/2002 5:43:46 AM PDT by AlligatorEyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
You know, like claiming that the "common law" exempts "white couples" from marriage licenses.

Common law exempts ALL couples from marriage licenses. God you always get it so wrong.

39 posted on 09/24/2002 6:25:06 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Common law exempts ALL couples from marriage licenses.

Actually, only 10 states recognize common-law marriages contracted within their borders.

40 posted on 09/24/2002 7:29:08 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson