If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
"How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?... Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape... which may point the way toward the new order... That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith."
1948 -- UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:
"Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable."
1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a "World Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World" to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 -- The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:
"Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution."
The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it "a consummation devoutly to be wished for" and said, "I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order." Senator Taylor later stated:
"We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves."
1950 -- In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said:
"we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.
UNESCO is a good way for Bush to keep the US media from reporting that the German judge was speaking the truth when she called Bush a Hitler.
Bush took the UN out of the business of determining when and against whom we will make war. He took our national sovereignty back from the UN and threw them a bone called UNESCO. He did it so the left would would not notice he was making the UN powerless. Seems like a good trade to me. The media like lots of others has not yet noticed what Bush did. He has in effect destroyed the UN as a force in world affairs.
A decade ago Bush's Daddy had to get UN permission to do anything about Saddam. Our own congress would not approve any action until Bush Sr. got permission from the UN. This time Bush told the UN to take its charter and shove it. But to keep the Media from being able to paint bush as the anti UN anti World Peace killer of babies, Bush refunded UNESCO. It was a brilliant move to return the USA to an independant nation determining its own destiny. Especially when most Americans would not have suppported what Bush did.
One of the ways people prove they don't usderstand much of anything, is by proving they do not understand much of anything.
Job security for a whole bunch of people.
Advancing international socialism under the banner of science.
Make no mistake. This bunch might munch caviar and spout culturalisms, but its real danger lies in the fine print. They own so many of our sovereign treasures under the guise of "World Heritage Sites." What's left to grab? And why did George re-up? Thankyou Ronnie Reagan for getting us out of this evil group.
What’s UNESCO good for? >>
Nothing, get us out.