Replies

Oh no...opus time eh?

I'm still waiting slanderer.

Should they boot your wolf ticket selling and preening ass, we would all be best served. You need to cool off. Insulting me when I did nothing to prod you on. What the hell is your problem son?

Are you suffering from the delusions you always accuse the dopers of?

And you and CJ know damn well I'm not one of them.

You seem to have taken leave of your senses....seriously.

Alas, I myself make mistakes on occasion, wardaddy. Indeed you are not one of the many loons who are squatting in FR. I reviewed your posts on this thread and I see you held a neutral, non-judgmental stance early on, which might be what colored the perceptions of others. While we must be non-judgmental regarding the state of another person's grace, one cannot be non-judgmental when it comes to evil behaviors. No one was seriously asking that the woman be publicly crucified, just that what they saw with their eyes made them recoil in horror and anguish, and the desire to lash out is a natural reaction to cruelty. To allow such calloused cruelty would infringe on the rights of others to pursue happiness, knowing that such cruelty would be allowed with impunity. That is why jurors willingly place their lives on hold to sit in judgment of another's deeds. Perhaps a sociologist can be all detached as he or she comments on a cannibal's society. We might have a scientific interest in their religion, their way of life, their lores and tales and social structures. But that same detachment does not follow through when one is looking at one's own society.