THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BEYOND CORRUPT, IT'S ALSO EVIL WARNS JIM ROBINSON IN SCATHING ATTACK OF TRUTH

freerepublic ^ | 9/21/2002 | Jim Robinson

[TLBSHOW]

The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

And what is this evil that triumphs when good men do nothing? What are we really talking about here and is it worth fighting for? Is it worth turning our heads and allowing evil to continue on while we do nothing? (and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).

Corruption is accepting campaign cash from the Chinese in exchange for military hardware. Corruption is accepting campaign cash as bribes from Indonesian power brokers, from Buddhist Monks, from corrupt corporate moguls. Corruption is defined by the myriad criminal acts and practices of the Clintons and the Gores and their corrupt Democrat minions.

Corruption is the land grabs, the power grabs, the gun grabs, the bribery, the shady deals, the high crimes and treason. Corruption is the theft of campaign dollars through forced labor union deductions. Corruption is the systematic indoctrination of several generations of our youth with socialist dogma via government school systems. Corruption is the removal of God from public life and substituting in the evil homosexual/feminist agenda and the destruction of moral society. Corruption is lying to the public about global warming and the selling of the Kyoto treaty. Corruption is giving up our national sovereignty to the United Nations. Corruption is the abuses of office, obstruction of justice, lying, perjury and subornation of perjury.

The Democrat Party is thoroughly corrupt. There is no question about that, but it's way beyond corrupt. It's also evil.

Waco was evil. The killing of innocent men, women, children and babies is evil. Torturing them for weeks on end, gassing them, and then burning them alive is pure evil. This was perpetrated by a corrupt and evil Democrat Administration and covered-up by corrupt and evil Democrat Congressmen and Senators, many of whom you are saying should be allowed to remain in office even today.

And as bad as that is, it pales in comparison to the Democrat government sanctioned and funded wholesale slaughter of the most innocent life of all, the murder of innocent human life in the womb. This is evil. Pure evil. And this evilness is openly perpetrated by a thoroughly corrupt and evil Democrat Party. The same corrupt and evil Democrat Congress and Judiciary whom you are now saying deserve to remain in office.

IMHO, allowing these Democrats to remain in power is aiding and abetting the corruption and treason, and is acting as an accessory before and after the fact to the murderers of innocent human life. Is doing nothing and allowing this evil to triumph evil itself?

I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life. I see that the only Party capable of blocking and defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close that as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

JIM ROBINSON

[Thom Pain]

"President Bush correctly tagged three renegade nations as an "Axis of evil." I wish he had the same courage to tag the RATS as the "Party of Evil.""

Bush can't possibly do that until WE turn out in droves and vote Repub super-majorities in both houses. Daschle and his jackals would be willing to shut down all legislation (which would prevent Bush from funding anything) if he (Bush) were to declare war on the Dems.

We need to do our part and create the majorities. Remember, Repub no-shows in 1998 elections allowed the Dems (and treasonous Repubs) to let Klintoon walk. Had we sent a mandate with our votes in 98 the story would have been entirely different!

[Enduring Freedom]

Nice job!

A Socialist Government is far worse than the mafia. Want proof?

The mafia won't reward deadbeats and freaks in exchange for votes by crippling the most productive among us.

The mafia understands the need for incentives and support to keep the money-makers producing. Hell, we already pay for the privilege of keeping our homes (property tax), having a job (income tax), having a business (business tax), buying products and services (retail tax). The mafia would be a welcome relief!

Most entrepreneurs, and good workers, would actually flourish in a mafia-controlled government. Why?

The class system of Socialism is just slavery. Entrepreneurs are a threat to the ruling government as they have the ability to change class and thereby threaten the monopoly on power. They are crushed under Socialism, using the tools of class justice and class envy.

Socialist justice, you see, is not really justice, it is an agenda. In an O.J. Simpson/Microsoft/SCOFLAW/obesity and tobacco class-action/Janet Reno world, justice is politicized and scandalous. Votes and raw power are the locus of control. Justice under the Clinton appointees (47% of sitting federal judges today were appointed by the SinkMaster) is all about class justice as against the 'evil' corporations, entrepreneurs and the rich.

A Godfather justice system (as portrayed in the movies by Marlon Brando) would actually honor and respect good people, and punish the weasels and the unproductive. Is it pretty, no. But again, a welcome relief in comparison to the Socialist version.

The Socialists would gladly rape and pillage the economy and degrade it to third-world conditions for the masses. The ruling elite would still continue to enjoy luxury and decadence by whatever means necessary. And in comparison to the oppressed majority, they would live like Arab sheiks. The evil bastards actually enjoy the contrast. Can you say 'Mugabe'?

[doc]

I have a hard time looking at democratic congressman and realizing what they stand for.

[TiaS]

Unfortunately, the well-informed and concerned voter is a minority in New Mexico and because of the numbers they feel Richardson will be impossible to defeat.

[buzzyboop]

I think the term liberals should replace the term democrats, Zell Miller is a good example of a conservative democrat, John McCain is a liberal republican, which would you prefer?

Interesting comment and choice. Of the two types of individuals, that is, the conservative Democrat or the liberal Republican, I will choose the conservative Democrat always, since ideals are independent of party affiliation.

Of the two individuals however, throw them both in the trash. Both McCain and Zell are morally bankrupt.

[FreeLibertarian]

In some of your posts you make some good points and your passion for what you believe is admirable, but might I suggest to you that the self-righteous attitude with which you direct them peppered with demeaning insults against posters who are just as patriotic and concerned about our country as you are, does not go very far in making your case. I have not responded up to this point, but your needless attacks on other FReepers are a distraction and are counterproductive to the purpose of this forum and this thread.

I do not see that I have peppered demeaning insults against anyone on this thread. I do disagree with the basic premise that voting a straight GOP ticket is going to solve anything. The title to the thread makes it very clear the reason to vote for the GOP is because the Democrats are more corrupt than the Republicans. So much so that they are evil.

When you have a barrel full of rotten apples you don't pick out the least rotten to save, you throw out the whole bunch and start over.

[sweetliberty]

I apologize for the misunderstanding. That post was not directed at you but at Nopardons who incessantly and unproductively attacks anyone who disagrees with her/him. I included you in the response because I perceived that you were one of the unjustified recipients of those attacks.

[Dick Bachert]

God bless ya, JimRob!

When the klintoons -- THE poster kids for the Democrats -- hit DC, I told friends that these people were not simply misguided or wrongheaded -- they were EVIL -- CONSCIOUSLY, WILLFULLY, PALPABLY EVIL.

Within weeks, their behavior proved me right.

We must keep saying these things until enough of our friends and neighbors GET IT!!!

[sweetliberty]

See my post #367.

[FreeLibertarian]

I apologize for the misunderstanding. That post was not directed at you but at Nopardons who incessantly and unproductively attacks anyone who disagrees with her/him. I included you in the response because I perceived that you were one of the unjustified recipients of those attacks.

Apology accepted and I apoligize for not understanding your intent.

[bazbo]

Thanks for your post. The sense of frustration we feel is the obstacle to overcome. How we tackle the obstacle seems to be the frustrating part. Maybe supporting the lesser of two evils can be the short term goal. Voting and becoming involved on the local level might be the long term solution. The problem I have with that is I don't want to get involved by running on the local level. It's fear of the unknown on my part and fear of a lack of support. If you or I were to run as a candidate would we chose Republican, Independent, some new party? It just seems as though there is no chance for the thinking candidate unless you're filthy rich or backed by an established political party. I may have opened up a new can of worms and raised more questions than answers. Yes frustrating is a good choice of words. Thanks again for your comments.

[sneakers]

Thanks, MeeknMing! I, too, will be voting straight GOP as well. I'm not even going to bother looking at what the other candidates messages are. I know that's not the way to choose a candidate, but we've got to send a message that says "The REPUBLICAN Party philosophy - one of conservative values - is the norm in our country; though those poor, mis-lead democrat (like I was 14 years ago) voters don't seem to get it.

[ghostrider]

...I suggest to you that the self-righteous attitude with which you direct them peppered with demeaning insults against posters who are just as patriotic and concerned about our country as you are, does not go very far in making your case.

It is your right to hold the opinion that my comments are self-righteous. Likewise, it is my right to believe that I was merely stating an opinion and responding to a personal attack. I do not see where I have peppered anyone with demeaning insults, nor have I implied that any poster was unpatriotic

I have not responded up to this point, but your needless attacks on other FReepers are a distraction and are counterproductive to the purpose of this forum and this thread.

After reviewing the my replies on this thread, I don't see where I have attacked anyone. I did respond, to one attack on me for being "pathetic," was nothing more than an attempt at "silly intimidation."

[ghostrider]

I accept your apology, and please accept mine for not reading your post before I responded. Cheers!

[carenot]

Thank you for the flag.

[Burlem]

Of the two individuals however, throw them both in the trash. Both McCain and Zell are morally bankrupt

I can understand the comment about McCain, but how is it true with Zell Miller?

[Red Jones]

that's a very funny cartoon; Unfortunately, the hold-up character should be an elephant in order to be accurate and the label should say 'Republican'.

For a few years after Ross Perot got so many votes in 92 as an anti-government candidate the congress did in fact slow down growth in government spending dramatically. But Republicans took over the House in 95, at that point they had more control over the budget process than the Democrats. I read in National Review that in the years 1995-1999 the annual growth rate in the federal budget exceeded the annual growth rate in the years 1990-1994 when the democrats had more control over the budget. The defense increases did not begin until after Bush got in, so you can't excuse this with defense spending.

Then, when Bush became president the lid on spending really went off. Bush increased spending on the Department of Education in his first year from about 30 billion a year to about 60 billion a year. With 60 billion dollars a year you can give $10,000 vouchers to 6 million kids' parents, or you can give $6,000 vouchers to 10 million kids' parents. Bush preferred to give this money to bureaucrats, talk about a pipe dream, he thinks the money is better spent like that.

In Bush' second year in office he's growing the government by 13.9%. This is faster than at any time since LBJ when vietnam war expenses and great society expenses were foisted onto taxpayers all at once. The majority of this increase is not for defense spending or homeland security.

So, I would have to say that the cartoon is delusional or outdated. We as a people need to beat up both the democrat and the republican party. We need to systematically throw big spending incumbents out. We re-elect 95% of all incumbents regardless of party, so the incumbents, regardless of party, can and do walk on us.

Sadly, as someone told me here, I am on the dark side. Meaning that I am looking forward in November to voting mostly democrat. In those individual races where I've already chosen the democrat over the republican it is because the republicans are incumbents who have done harm to me. The democrat challengers have not harmed me as of yet. If they do harm me while in office, then I'll vote against them later. This includes both national and state races.

Don't vote for the lesser of two evils, vote no on incumbents who are bad.

[Paulus Invictus]

Jim, that is the most succinct and correct assessment of the RATS I have ever read! Great stuff! I propose this be published and placed in every possible news outlet and used as hand bills to place in the hands of all possible readers. We must defeat RATS at every level of government!

[He Rides A White Horse]

I think the term liberals should replace the term democrats

Actually, I think the term 'communist' is much more descriptive.

[harpo11]

I love seeing my family love life and reach for the stars of opportunity that freedom and liberty represent in this great and beautiful country, my home, my land, my county, America.

I love the generations of brave men and women who stood fast to the faith of our fathers and fought courageously at great risk to their own personal life and suffered and sacrificed with their precious life's bread in battlegrounds all over the world so that Americans will remain free.

I love all of those happy independent self-reliant Americans citizens who get up every day living the dream and providing for our future by raising their families, being involved in their communities, and going to work or volunteering for serving in our great military.

We are all sons and daughters of Lady Liberty. Her loving arms give to America the wings to feel the winds of freedom blowing strong and proud in our veins.