Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BEYOND CORRUPT, IT'S ALSO EVIL WARNS JIM ROBINSON IN SCATHING ATTACK OF TRUTH
freerepublic ^ | 9/21/2002 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/21/2002 11:39:06 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

And what is this evil that triumphs when good men do nothing? What are we really talking about here and is it worth fighting for? Is it worth turning our heads and allowing evil to continue on while we do nothing? (and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).

Corruption is accepting campaign cash from the Chinese in exchange for military hardware. Corruption is accepting campaign cash as bribes from Indonesian power brokers, from Buddhist Monks, from corrupt corporate moguls. Corruption is defined by the myriad criminal acts and practices of the Clintons and the Gores and their corrupt Democrat minions.

Corruption is the land grabs, the power grabs, the gun grabs, the bribery, the shady deals, the high crimes and treason. Corruption is the theft of campaign dollars through forced labor union deductions. Corruption is the systematic indoctrination of several generations of our youth with socialist dogma via government school systems. Corruption is the removal of God from public life and substituting in the evil homosexual/feminist agenda and the destruction of moral society. Corruption is lying to the public about global warming and the selling of the Kyoto treaty. Corruption is giving up our national sovereignty to the United Nations. Corruption is the abuses of office, obstruction of justice, lying, perjury and subornation of perjury.

The Democrat Party is thoroughly corrupt. There is no question about that, but it's way beyond corrupt. It's also evil.

Waco was evil. The killing of innocent men, women, children and babies is evil. Torturing them for weeks on end, gassing them, and then burning them alive is pure evil. This was perpetrated by a corrupt and evil Democrat Administration and covered-up by corrupt and evil Democrat Congressmen and Senators, many of whom you are saying should be allowed to remain in office even today.

And as bad as that is, it pales in comparison to the Democrat government sanctioned and funded wholesale slaughter of the most innocent life of all, the murder of innocent human life in the womb. This is evil. Pure evil. And this evilness is openly perpetrated by a thoroughly corrupt and evil Democrat Party. The same corrupt and evil Democrat Congress and Judiciary whom you are now saying deserve to remain in office.

IMHO, allowing these Democrats to remain in power is aiding and abetting the corruption and treason, and is acting as an accessory before and after the fact to the murderers of innocent human life. Is doing nothing and allowing this evil to triumph evil itself?

I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life. I see that the only Party capable of blocking and defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close that as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

JIM ROBINSON


TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; corrupt; corruption; democrats; election; evil; reno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,041-1,056 next last
To: Texasforever
What's up Tex? I haven't posted for a while. Just wanted to see how were doing.
261 posted on 09/21/2002 9:37:57 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What I want to know is, what is John Ashcroft going to do about THIS:
DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON.....(INTRODUCTION) and (TABLE OF CONTENTS<-(LINK)
262 posted on 09/21/2002 9:39:06 PM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
LOL Tell us how you really feel! But I agree, evil is certainly making the most of liberals right now. Case in point: the 2 young kids who murdered their father so they could live with the gay molestor neighbor: the liberal papers presented him as an ADULT FRIEND! It's true -the Boy Scouts are attacked as a hate group while NAMBLA is making their play for the prime time. May God protect us - and our children.
263 posted on 09/21/2002 9:42:01 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carenot; Texasforever
Strictly speaking you have a valid point. People are never evil. They can be evil-doers and doers of evil deeds, though. Even Hitler was not evil, although colloquially we say he was as a manner of speaking of the evil he perpetrated. Even so, when you read Jim's essay, he doesn't call Democrats in general evil, but their leaders in Congress and the judiciary, and even then he stresses that the Party itself is evil and brings forth evil results. I really have no quibble with his essay. It was right on.
264 posted on 09/21/2002 9:43:25 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. Depending on a political party to defeat evil is idolotrous folly.

I wasn't even going to vote at all in 1996, Newt Gingritch had just sold us out on the budget thing. No one had read it. He even told Rush he would not allow it. But then he pushed it through, the next day.

Rush Limbaugh said that was the worse day he had ever had, and he almost left.

He never had "Mr. Newt" on again.

265 posted on 09/21/2002 9:44:42 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
What's up Tex? I haven't posted for a while. Just wanted to see how were doing.

Like any good soap opera you can take a week off and come right back and never miss a beat. lol

266 posted on 09/21/2002 9:44:58 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
No and NO again ! The problem is fringers, ( THE ENEMY WITHIN ) who hurt the Conservative movement, far worse, than the " evil " Dem voting populace does. How so ? They are blinkered and blinded to , sometimes even year for , the supremicy of the Dems, delusionally believing that there'll be some kind of bloody revolution. That will NEVER come. So, in fact, all they do, like the proverbial dog in the manger, is help in the ruination of this country.

We either hang together, or we hang seperately. Familiar words ? I hope so. They also make a lot of sense. The Dems, for all of their squabbles, pull together in the end. They have patience and don't, like spoiled brats, demand change immediately. These are traits which Republicans and to a greater extent, Conservatives, of every stripe, need to emulate.Here's another familiar sentimentt ..." YOU'RE EITHER WITH US, OR AGAINST US." That applies to how all of us need to view those who refuse to vote for and help to get a GOP majority in both Houses. The president's hands are tied without this ; his and our desires are hampered to nonexistance, because he doesn't have this majority.

Want a Conservative majority on the Supreme Court ? We aren't going to get that, nor most of the things we all yearn for, without having a solid majority in both Houses.

That 1/2 a loaf IS better than none and that 1/2 a glass of whatever, will keep you from dying of dehydration. Don't cut of your collective noses, to spite your faces ! Shop worn, tired, but TRUE old saws. They would never have become " old saws ", if the words weren't true and the message didn't wear well, through the test of time.

267 posted on 09/21/2002 9:46:53 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw ... you're a middle of the roader. You know what that is, don't you dear ? ROAD KILL !
268 posted on 09/21/2002 9:47:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Like any good soap opera you can take a week off and come right back and never miss a beat. lol."

I suppose that's true. You haven't lost your sense of humor at any rate.

269 posted on 09/21/2002 9:48:22 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
If the Democrats are evil, isn't it because their agenda is evil, as well?

Seems to me the Republicans are doing what the Democrats wanted to do but couldn't.

270 posted on 09/21/2002 9:48:46 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.

That is the most trite, not to mention, overused bumper sticker phrase on this site. The fact is that it is used by every mal-content that has ever punched a ballot. It was said about Reagan it is said about Bush. The reality is that there is a small segment of the population that are just plain angry all the time. NOTHING is enough and NOTHING ever will be enough.

271 posted on 09/21/2002 9:50:51 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ghostrider
This is evident when they are more concerned about what's in their stolen FBI files

Hey man, that is what I have been saying.

Thanks.

272 posted on 09/21/2002 9:51:44 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jigsaw
The primary love of Liberals is for themselves.

With more than a litte self-hate mixed in.

273 posted on 09/21/2002 9:52:41 PM PDT by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: carenot
You, like the other political naifs and the historical facts impaired crowd , are dewlling on what you want , instead of what has absolutely NO president, nor Constitutionally described job. If you expected President Bush to " go after " the Clintons and everyione in that administration, it's because you don't understand what is feasible. There has been no , not a single president, in the entire history of this nation, who has, once in office, gone after ( asked the DOJ , the Att. Gen, or anyone or any agency ) a previous president and his corrupt administration. If you think that X42 and his bunch are the first / the only, guilty of corruption, then you and your ilk are delsusional , ill educated, and haven't a clue.
274 posted on 09/21/2002 9:54:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
If the Dems are really that corrupt then it is fair to ask; are normal political processes the solution?

Well, they seem to be above the law.

Seems that no one will go against an ex-president.

I wonder why?

275 posted on 09/21/2002 9:54:37 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
What a great website!

Thanks for the link. I hadn't seen it before.

Go Coleman Go!
276 posted on 09/21/2002 9:56:13 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
The 9/11 terrorists entered this country L-E-G-A-L-Y .

Johnny Taliban Lindh was born here; so was Padillo.Seven of the eight Buffalo men, now in bail ( may they never get any !) hearings, were born here too.

Thanks for palying. Wanna try again ?

277 posted on 09/21/2002 9:57:16 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Seems that no one will go against an ex-president.

For what?

278 posted on 09/21/2002 9:57:33 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: carenot
You need to be taught how to think ; you " feel ", like a Liberal.
279 posted on 09/21/2002 9:58:54 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: carenot
WRONG ! Rush has had Newt on his radio show, since 1996. He has been on , as a matter of fact, this year. Too bad that you have a selective memory.
280 posted on 09/21/2002 10:04:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,041-1,056 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson