Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWRWinger
If Saddam poses a threat with nuclear weapons, why haven't the Israelis bombed the nuclear facilities, like they did in the '80's? If Saddam was that much of a threat, the Isaelis would eliminate it without asking for anyones permission.

If this administration, Bush, Thompson, et al, were really sincere about eliminating terrorism, Arafat would have ceased to breathe a long time ago.

You got it backwards...US is handling Iraq and ISrael is taking care of Arafat.

13 posted on 09/21/2002 6:19:00 AM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: copycat
You got it backwards...US is handling Iraq and ISrael is taking care of Arafat.

Sorry you willfully ignore the point of my comments. This administration has it backwards.
In what little weapons traning I've had, I was taught to place two shots, center-of-mass on the closest threat, then one or two shots on the more distant threats, coming back to the initial threat to make sure the threat had been eliminated. Illegal aliens pose a much greater, immediate threat to the USA than Saddam. Yet you and the bush-bots in la-la land, choose to ignore this fact. Why is that?

19 posted on 09/21/2002 7:06:39 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson