Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texasforever
And if vicodin was legal, a doctor could prescribe it and people could take it work and not get fired, since they were taking it under orders of a physician. What interest would an employer have in picking and choosing which prescription drugs to disallow in the workplace?
89 posted on 09/20/2002 9:01:10 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Dakmar
And if vicodin was legal, a doctor could prescribe it and people could take it work and not get fired, since they were taking it under orders of a physician. What interest would an employer have in picking and choosing which prescription drugs to disallow in the workplace?

If that person was taking that medication on the job and was involved in any kind of accident during work hours or on the way home after ingesting that drug at work then the employer would be liable if the dosage was such as to be impairing.

91 posted on 09/20/2002 9:05:19 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Dakmar
. What interest would an employer have in picking and choosing which prescription drugs to disallow in the workplace?

Why can't an employer get rid of someone because he don't like him? There are lots of people that want a job.

If I hire someone and pay them, why don't I have a say about who I pay?

What if after I hire you and I meet your wife and she insults me? I am not allowed to get rid of you, and get someone that will be nice to me?

239 posted on 09/21/2002 3:53:16 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson