To: vannrox
Anyone know what the court's rationale was?
4 posted on
09/20/2002 9:40:12 AM PDT by
inquest
To: inquest
I'll see if I can find the text of the ruling somewhere when I have a moment later today.
6 posted on
09/20/2002 9:47:11 AM PDT by
mvpel
To: inquest
You know, it occurs to me that this may be a deceptive Brady spin on their actual ruling.
I recall there was a row over the city of Albuquerque's desire to ban the carrying of concealed weapons within the city limits - the Supreme Court might actually have struck down the law because it had a provision for city and county opt-out which is flatly unconstitutional by the plain language of section six.
9 posted on
09/20/2002 9:50:20 AM PDT by
mvpel
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson