[BenLurkin]

Taking your research as represented:
> The simple answer is that we secure this liberty for ourselves while we still have our guns.
> Not pretty I know but it may be an unfortunate necessity.
> And BTW, you can expect the Fedral government would support the State even though it is the State that is out of control.

[Jeff Head]

The simple answer is that we secure this liberty for ourselves while we still have our guns.

Exactly.

[sneakypete]

And BTW, you can expect the Fedral government would support the State even though it is the State that is out of control.

They already have. The potential for the "Emerson" case to set a precedent that would dismantle all feral gooberment gun control laws is what inspired Bubba-2 and Janet Ashcroft to file their little notice to the Supreme Court that all the partisan Bush-Bots spun as "proof" Bubba-2 is pro-2n Amendment. They all cite the part that says the feral gooberment now looks at gun possession as a individual right,and skim right over and ignore the part where the "BUT...." comes in. This is where they make the claim that despite it being a individual right,the feral gooberment reserves to right to "regulate gun ownership/possession with reasonable restrictions". In short,Bubba-2 is claiming it is a inidividual right,as long as the feral gooberment is willing to grant that right to you.

Is there any wonder I call him Bubba-2?