Exactly.
They already have. The potential for the "Emerson" case to set a precedent that would dismantle all feral gooberment gun control laws is what inspired Bubba-2 and Janet Ashcroft to file their little notice to the Supreme Court that all the partisan Bush-Bots spun as "proof" Bubba-2 is pro-2n Amendment. They all cite the part that says the feral gooberment now looks at gun possession as a individual right,and skim right over and ignore the part where the "BUT...." comes in. This is where they make the claim that despite it being a individual right,the feral gooberment reserves to right to "regulate gun ownership/possession with reasonable restrictions". In short,Bubba-2 is claiming it is a inidividual right,as long as the feral gooberment is willing to grant that right to you.
Is there any wonder I call him Bubba-2?