Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TC Rider
"They ruled not."

Wrong. They ruled that there was no "judicial notice" that such a weapon was "usefull" as a weapon of the militia. Big difference.

BTW, it is interesting that one of the justices later acknowledged the use by himself of just such a weapon when in the service of his country in WWI.

266 posted on 09/20/2002 9:42:24 PM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: wcbtinman
BTW, it is interesting that one of the justices later acknowledged the use by himself of just such a weapon when in the service of his country in WWI.

Would have been great for 'cleaning' the trenches.

315 posted on 09/21/2002 4:43:36 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson