his presentation of why he didn't ask ("It would be a violation of their rights") is Clintonian word-parsing at best.
Would that be more, or less Clintonian than the parsing needed by the Bush Administration to try and pass off Section 245(i) as anything other than an extension of Clinton's targeted Amnesty for Illegals?
147 posted on 09/20/2002 5:34:32 AM PDT by Sabertooth