Replies

Okay, smarty-pants, let's set aside expanding the interpretation, and just look at the law, as written. In that respect, do you agree with the following, and, if not, why?

It is certainly reasonable to expect that one will not be subject to cameras looking under one's skirts.

Give me an answer, do.

Paul

I have seen reports lately about people who have installed hidden cameras in bathrooms, dressing rooms, shower areas, a tenant's bedroom, and similar places. Perhaps this law (which I have not read) was written to address those issues and thus was not written in a way so as to make filming in a public location illegal. If so, it could be that the judges' ruling was quite proper.

As to your question, I think it is reasonable for a woman to consider the area under her skirt to be private and not subject to being video-taped by strangers.

Perhaps the legislature could now address that issue. On the other hand, shall we have the legislatures try to criminalize every sort of obnoxious and unreasonable behavior under the sun? If so, what shall be the punishment for public farting of for honking at the car in front of you the second the light turns to green?