In case you ain't noticed, Sherlock, WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN ATTACKED!
My apologies for missing your post earlier.
In answer to your news flash, "we" have also attacked the following countries over the past several years:
Afghanistan was targeted for regime change owing to the Taliban being kissing cousins to bin Laden and Al Qeda, not because we had any proof of the Afghan government, such as it was, being involved in the attacks of 9/11. As far as harboring terrorists, Syria and Iran would rank farther up the list, wouldn't you say, than Iraq?
Are we willing to press our luck with an all-out attack on Iraq, possibly escalating to the rest of the Arab world, possibly going nuclear, on the basis of such flimsy evidence as has been presented to date that Saddam Hussein aspires to build weapons of mass destruction, etc.?