Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catholicguy
They had no trouble writing a long and critical article about Michael Rose though. Weird.

Dittos. And suspicious. Hudson is becoming too political because of his role as advisor to Bush. He's taking the same diplomatic approach with our bishops.

His softball interview with Cornwell was just as WEIRD as his softball interview with Gorbachev. Very weird.

23 posted on 09/20/2002 9:43:50 AM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp
Dittos. And suspicious. Hudson is becoming too political because of his role as advisor to Bush. He's taking the same diplomatic approach with our bishops.

His softball interview with Cornwell was just as WEIRD as his softball interview with Gorbachev. Very weird

<> Yeah, weird and ironic that the editor of a magazine baptised "Crisis" would be so taciturn when posing questions to such men as Cronwell and Gorbachev.

I was born in Vermont and I can appreciate the taciturn approach of a Calvin Coolidge when one is addressing a pacific political situation but when one asks such a one as Cornwell to sit for an interview, I expect the editors of "Crisis" to act like Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys (even though Ethan was born a flatlander in Connecticut and the boys were vigilantes).

But what is inexplicable is the robust aggressiveness of how they went after Michael Rose (justified, imo) compared to the tepid timorousness of how they approached Cornwell. <>

24 posted on 09/20/2002 11:05:43 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson