Skip to comments.
Scientists Claim Antimatter Breakthrough
Ananova ^
| 9-18-2002
Posted on 09/18/2002 11:47:20 AM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
1
posted on
09/18/2002 11:47:21 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Would matter/anti-matter reactions create energy? Would it be safer than nuclear power?
2
posted on
09/18/2002 11:50:53 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: blam
But does it really matter?
To: blam
How long until Bodansky claims that some of the antimatter is missing and was sold to Al Qaeda?
4
posted on
09/18/2002 11:51:46 AM PDT
by
mikegi
To: blam
It's this process which provides the power source for Starship Enterprise in its film and TV space adventures. All right!! Time to go where no man has gone before!!!
5
posted on
09/18/2002 11:52:53 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
To: blam
Whoa,
Antimatter energy makes atomic energy look tiny.
The energy released from the collision of Antimatter and matter will be incrdible.
If that were harnessed, just like in Star Trek, the energy potential is beyond imagination.
In 20 years they would be talking about how the saddams of the world are trying to get hold of antimatter bombs, now THAT would be scary!!
6
posted on
09/18/2002 11:53:15 AM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: blam
It's this process which provides the power source for Starship Enterprise in its film and TV space adventures. Well, duh!?!
To: *RealScience; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
To: mikegi
How long until Bodansky claims that some of the antimatter is missing and was sold to Al Qaeda? How long until Scott Ritter denies it?
To: BenLurkin
Would matter/anti-matter reactions create energy? Would it be safer than nuclear power? Yes, but it's a safe bet that more energy was spent to produce the anti-matter than would be released in a matter/anti-matter reaction.
10
posted on
09/18/2002 11:58:21 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Aric2000
Antimatter energy makes atomic energy look tiny. Indeed it does. Both are based on the equivalence between matter and energy. In atomic energy--whether fission or fusion--it is only the differences in the masses of the before and after products that are converted to energy. The percentage difference as a mass fraction is fairly small. In a matter/antimatter collision, everything is converted to energy!
To: blam
To: mlo
it's a safe bet that more energy was spent to produce the anti-matter than would be released in a matter/anti-matter reaction. I think that's probably true. But, even if it is, wouldn't it be useful to have such a concentrated source of energy?
To: blam
"Antimatter is a reverse form of ordinary matter. When the two kinds of matter meet they annihilate each other in an enormous burst of energy"
If only they had discovered "anti-Clinton"
To: BenLurkin
Yes, No.
The cost of generating the anti-matter would still be greater than the net energy gain.
To: blam; mhking
Scientists have announced the first large-scale production of antimatter. A team based at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research in Geneva say they have developed a large amount of the substance.
In unrelated news, Geneva disappeared in an enormous explosion, with an estimated yield of almost six gigatons. This is 100 times as powerful as the largest nuclear detonation recorded, which was in 1961 off of the island of Novaya Zemlya.
A scientist at FermiLab, in Illinois, was on the telephone with a researcher the CERN lab at the time of the explosion. He states that the last words he heard on the phone before the detonation were "Hey, Hans, HOLD MUH BEER AND WATCH THIS!"
16
posted on
09/18/2002 12:05:14 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Pearls Before Swine
In a matter/antimatter collision, everything is converted to energy!Something like the Hormone Replacement Stuff that Art Bell advertises. :^))
17
posted on
09/18/2002 12:05:34 PM PDT
by
scouse
To: capt. norm
ouch...
To: BenLurkin
Would matter/anti-matter reactions create energy?
It would relase a lot of energy. A matter <-> anti-matter reaction is 100% mass to energy transformation. A nuclear bomb on the other hand only transforms around 8% of it's mass.
Would it be safer than nuclear power?
No. Any contact between normal and anti matter is big firework. The only way to contain antimatter is by some sort of magnetic trap.
19
posted on
09/18/2002 12:07:54 PM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: blam; Poohbah
Antimatter, shantimatter -- what I want to know is if
pasta and
antipasta meet, do they mutually annihilate?
Last time I went to the Olive Garden for dinner, I heard and saw things that led me to believe that this is so...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson