Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deputy Retires After Arrest In Prostitution Sting (Hold muh beer alert!)
WKMG/Orlando ^ | 9.17.02

Posted on 09/17/2002 9:01:19 PM PDT by mhking

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: FreeLibertarian
"So all you are left with is morality."

Morality is a religious issue and is the prerogative of the church.

21 posted on 09/18/2002 6:28:19 AM PDT by Born to be Wild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Born to be Wild
"So all you are left with is morality."

Morality is a religious issue and is the prerogative of the church.

And as such should not be the basis for a law.

22 posted on 09/18/2002 8:29:03 AM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Zack...Violent????? Ever been to Nevada?????
23 posted on 09/18/2002 8:33:32 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
So you are maintaining that venereal disease suddenly ceases to be a problem if it becomes legal? Do you believe it is in society's best interest to have women selling their bodies on the street? Do you think that the only women who engage in prostitution are ones who decide to by their own free choice? No, prostitution is a dark and violent business, and has no place in a just society. It is not a victimless crime.
24 posted on 09/18/2002 9:28:13 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Do you believe it is in society's best interest to have women selling their bodies on the street?

Uh oh, an appeal to "society". Who knows what that means?

25 posted on 09/18/2002 9:41:27 AM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
You do not know what "society" means? Do you maintain that the spread of disease from prostitution would cease if it were legal? Do you maintain that drug usage surrounding prostituion would cease if made legal? Do you maintain that all women who engage in prostitution do so willingly and are not forced to do so? Do you maintain that violence and abuse of those engaged in it would cease if prostitution were made legal?

The line of reasoning that says, "It does not violate my physical rights, so it should be legal" defense is invalid here, I believe. If, for instance, two people publicly engage in intercourse on the sidewalk, it would not stop me from going to work, earning a living, etc. But should that be somehting we are forced to live with? By the same token, should families be forced to raise their children around the moral and physical filth that open prostitution engenders.

26 posted on 09/18/2002 10:56:07 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
No sex without condoms is allowed at the brothels. Anyone doing so would be fired on the spot.

Really? And you are absolutely certain of this? The whorehouses are so publicly high-minded that they will fire a girl "on the spot" if they view sex occuring without a condom?

Do you think a prostitute wants to risk a six figure income as well as her own health?

Of course! They wouldn't be engaged in such a risky, dirty business otherwise. A condom may not stop the HIV virus from transferring from partner to partner. They are literally playing Russian roulette with their very lives. Most women who get involved in prostitution have severe emotional and mental issues that they have failed to deal with.

27 posted on 09/18/2002 11:01:40 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
Morality is a religious issue and is the prerogative of the church.

Morality is the perogative of the church to preach to the world. All people are liable for a moral law. Without it governance becomes impossible, and a society will not remain free.

28 posted on 09/18/2002 11:03:51 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Wouldn't you have thought the other deputies would'a let ole Lee in on the plans for the sting?
29 posted on 09/18/2002 2:52:23 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Morality is a religious issue and is the prerogative of the church.

Morality is the perogative of the church to preach to the world. All people are liable for a moral law. Without it governance becomes impossible, and a society will not remain free.

Who determines which church the supposed liability is owed to? Do we all owe liabilities to all possible churchs? Or only to the one we choose to believe in? Or some combination of the above options. As you can see, governing on that basis is impossible.

Do you see why seperation of church and state is so critical to the survival of the nation.

Your claim that all people are liable for a moral law is ridiculus.

30 posted on 09/18/2002 6:56:30 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
No sex without condoms is allowed at the brothels. Anyone doing so would be fired on the spot.

Really? And you are absolutely certain of this? The whorehouses are so publicly high-minded that they will fire a girl "on the spot" if they view sex occuring without a condom?

Do you think a prostitute wants to risk a six figure income as well as her own health?

Of course! They wouldn't be engaged in such a risky, dirty business otherwise. A condom may not stop the HIV virus from transferring from partner to partner. They are literally playing Russian roulette with their very lives. Most women who get involved in prostitution have severe emotional and mental issues that they have failed to deal with.

You have numerous preconceived incorrect ideas about prostitutuion. The fact is that when it is operated as a legal regulated business none of the problems you cite exist.

You have certainly heard the statement that "When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns". Well the same thing applies to prostitution or for that matter drugs. When criminals are the ones running a business they don't care about health care or safety of their employees, all they care about is how fast they can make a buck.

Legalization is the only cure to this problem.

31 posted on 09/18/2002 7:10:15 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Why do you really think prostitution is illegal?

As for health reasons, don't buy that. So many of the American people are very active sexually and with multiple, very multiple, partners. Health reasons really couldn't not be the real reason doesn't really make a difference these days. Of course, STD has always been with us and certainly spread through prostitution, but that kind was usually curable, I have heard. Prostitution was illegal long before the horrific diseases we have today.

Prostitution has been illegal for may years before this massive drug problem, so that is not the reason. As for the assault, violence, if it were not illegal a lot of that would not happen.

Do not get me wrong, I do not advocate prostitution, I think it is an abomination, but it is a little hypocritical in this day and age to make it illegal.

There is another hypocritical side to prostitution - why are the customers not charged and prosecuted?

I don't think it is any of the above although many of the things you list are certainly a part of the prostitution scene - not speaking from personal experience - mind you.

32 posted on 09/18/2002 7:22:04 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
So you are maintaining that venereal disease suddenly ceases to be a problem if it becomes legal?

Venereal disease ceases to be a problem when the sexual activity takes place in a business where regular weekly health checkups are performed on the workers.

Do you believe it is in society's best interest to have women selling their bodies on the street?

No allowing prostitutes to perform their business on the street should not be allowed for the same reasons that most business are not allowed to operate on the street. Prostitutes should be licensed, regulated, and their place of business controlled by the same zoning regulations that cover all businesses.

Do you think that the only women who engage in prostitution are ones who decide to by their own free choice? No, prostitution is a dark and violent business, and has no place in a just society. It is not a victimless crime.

When prostitution is legalized criminals no longer control the business and prostitutes are able to choose their employer just like any other business. Do you really think a legal business would try to hold an employee against their will? The only reaon that any prostitutes are victims is because attempting to regulate morality creates a situation here pimps are empowered to control prostitutes.

33 posted on 09/18/2002 7:25:36 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
Separating God from government will ensure the extinction of this nation. That is harsh, but truth it is. Feel free to mark my words and refer to them when and if America makes a conscious, collective, political decision to become atheistic in its governance.

However, making sure that government does not take over the church, and the church does not take over the government, is healthy, reasonable, and Biblical.

What I meant by my previous statement is that the church, through the guidance of the word of God, is responsible for teaching right from wrong. Morals and ethics come from God, and it is the churches job to preach them (among other things.) By "church" I mean any and all people who have been forgiven of their sins and bow to Christ as Lord.

34 posted on 09/19/2002 2:21:05 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
Your position is well thought out, but I cannot agree that were it legal, prostitution would become ship-shape and button-up, and a "responsible" business. Selling sex is still selling sex, whether it is a "legitimate" enterprise or not. Purchasing the use of someone else's sacred body is often conjoined with all sorts of unwholesome behavior. That is because it violates God's created order: we are not meant to give ourselves to anyone random person with enough money. Try as we might, prostitution will never be like popping over to the Wal-MArt for a pint of milk.

The issue of disease is still not addressed, because many women and men will are left with broken bodies and destroyed psyches from his practice.

35 posted on 09/19/2002 2:51:58 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
The issue of disease is still not addressed, because many women and men will are left with broken bodies and destroyed psyches from his practice.

In my youth, I worked on some large industrial construction projects. Unitl laws were passed that penalized employers for promoting unsafe construction practices broken bodies were a not uncommon practice. You will always have accidents because construction is a risky business, but now the industry is safer than it used to be.

You cannot regulate the safety practices of an illegal business, in fact making it illegal just raises the risk for the workers. Legal business can provide insurance, retirement and other benefits for their workers. Illegal businesses cannot.

36 posted on 09/21/2002 7:53:01 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
What I meant by my previous statement is that the church, through the guidance of the word of God, is responsible for teaching right from wrong. Morals and ethics come from God, and it is the churches job to preach them (among other things.) By "church" I mean any and all people who have been forgiven of their sins and bow to Christ as Lord.

The church is certainly a good source for teaching right from wrong but I don't believe it is the only possible source. A child can certainly be taught that harming another person is wrong without faith being a source for the lesson.

As far as Christianity being the correct religion, I can't say that I agree with you. Although I was baptized as a Christian, in my fifty-one years I have seen too many atrocities perpetrated by so called Christians, all in the name of morality.

Actually, IMO that is why Christianity is losing favor in this nation. Anyone who claims to be strongly religious and moral and then performs acts that show themselves to be hypocrites damages the perception of Christianity as a whole. I guess I have just seen too much hypocrisy to continue to believe.

37 posted on 09/21/2002 8:10:25 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nanny
Another thought along these lines.I can hire a man and a woman to have sex,I can film it,we can all make money from me selling it,we could all be 18 years old and it would all be legal,but,we could not buy a beer if we wanted to legaly,realy stupid laws.
38 posted on 09/21/2002 8:19:38 PM PDT by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
"but,we could not buy a beer if we wanted to legaly,realy stupid laws."

So true.

Also, those same 18 year olds can be sent to war to die for a country that does not allow them to buy beer.

39 posted on 09/22/2002 12:40:56 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
First of all, I am sorry that you have seen hypocrisy in Christians. However, consider this: you have not seen Christ in those people, and He is the source of our faith. Christ is never hypocritical, he is never rude, and He never lies. Sometimes His followers, sinners that we are, do all those things. But that does not, even in the slightest, reduce the legitimacy of Jesus Christ. He is Lord whether we acknowledge it or not.

Second, right and wrong and truth must come from God. They cannot come from anywhere else. My personal opinion really isn't worth more than yours. How can we tell between us? We must call on something higher.

Why should a child refrain from hurting others? Because his fellow man is made in the image of God and has inherent dignity because of that. We are God's highest creation, and He has forbidden us from destroying each other.

Without that we might as well regard each other as a bunch of animals, and after all we kill and eat animals. So I really have no source for my morality or the dignity of man with the God of the Bible.

40 posted on 09/22/2002 9:07:54 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson