Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RCW2001
The U.S. wants to get the S.C. to agree to a resolution containing conditions that will either bring meaningful control of Iraq or that Iraqis will reject. If the U.S. manages to pull that off, Iraq, the Europeans, and even the Arabs who pledged allegiance to the U.N. would be trapped. Nothing would stand in our way.

Other countries with their heads out of their butts know this. Hence the resistance from the Russians, Chinese, and French. Partly because of their financial aims in Iraq, and partly from instinct, they cling desperately to the U.N. S.C. as a method of controlling the Americans.

The resistance of these countries has been much noticed by our media, in a pathetic attempt to undermine domestic support for the president. What seems to be going unnoticed, however, is the tremendous stick the U.S. wields. U.S. unilateral action would be a disaster for the S.C. Such flagrant contempt for the U.N., deliberately displayed while all the world was watching, would be a crushing blow to what little prestige the body retains. Furthermore, were America to become so exasperated as to leave the S.C. behind the U.N. would forfeit any prospect of influencing our future activities. This possibility must seem especially alarming to the U.N.

The president's bellicose speaking since last Thursday is aimed exactly at this sore spot. He's reminding the U.N. constantly of his willingness, and political ability, to act without them. This forces the S.C. to go the extra mile, and then some, to satisfy the U.S.

A Congressional resolution authorizing force that isn't tied to U.N. action would be the final tolling of the bell. Bush would then enjoy both public support and congressional approval, and thus would have no significant political restraints on his actions. The U.N. would have to work with us, or face the unappetizing alternative of the U.S. occupying Iraq anyway with the U.N.'s influence gone.

Bush is going to get congressional approval. So, we will get much of what we want from the S.C., even with Iraq's latest offer.

12 posted on 09/17/2002 9:34:09 PM PDT by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timm
The resistance of these countries has been much noticed by our media, in a pathetic attempt to undermine domestic support for the president. What seems to be going unnoticed, however, is the tremendous stick the U.S. wields. U.S. unilateral action would be a disaster for the S.C. Such flagrant contempt for the U.N., deliberately displayed while all the world was watching, would be a crushing blow to what little prestige the body retains. Furthermore, were America to become so exasperated as to leave the S.C. behind the U.N. would forfeit any prospect of influencing our future activities. This possibility must seem especially alarming to the U.N.

The U.N coming crashing down if the U.S. acts unilaterally wtih perhaps Britain, Australia and Canada? Interesting. But have you thought of the flip side? What if every other nation becomes so tired and threatened of U.S. unilateralism and their "big stick" that they decide to form alliances and the like to counter the U.S?

Anyway, its gonna be interesting watching all the manouvering (sp) of the major players in the next couple of days/weeks.

14 posted on 09/18/2002 1:50:47 AM PDT by enrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson