Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

adding the actual decline in CFCs had not been measured when the U.N. report was compiled in 2000.

Does this surprise anyone?
I'll bet this question wasnt even asked by a reporter back then.

1 posted on 09/17/2002 10:29:45 AM PDT by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wallcrawlr
Cool, I guess. The only environmental activity
that seems to be working is "shut your hole."
2 posted on 09/17/2002 10:56:56 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
Ask any shipyard technician whose life depends on it about how CFCs behave when released into the hull of a ship. Those still living will tell you that released CFCs are much heavier than air, that CFCs released into a ship's hull will sink, force all the air out of a hull, and leave technicians dead within hulls because there'd be no air or oxygen to breath.

The most common CFC refrigerant, R-12, is over five times heavier than air -- it drops like a rock and flows downhill as water does. A fact that environmental "scientists" don't seem to know.

When "respected" scientists support fraud, their homeland culture's corruption factor has arrived at the pure-evil level.

3 posted on 09/17/2002 10:58:47 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
Won't they be suprised when the hole doesn't close because the cause of the so-called "hole" is caused by solar activity, or lack of it.
5 posted on 09/17/2002 11:19:52 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
I thought I read somewhere that it would close in 3-5 yrs.
8 posted on 09/17/2002 11:30:17 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
I remember reading about a French scientist describing a hole in the ozone layer over antarctica in the 1930's--long before CFC's. So if the CFC's didn't cause the problem, how is eliminating them solving the problem? Just more junk science.
9 posted on 09/17/2002 12:34:01 PM PDT by Artem55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
The ozone hole has been such a successful ploy by the environmental extremists that I doubt they will allow it to close, even if it requires "seeding" the stratosphere with CFCs in order to keep it open. For information to back up that assertion, do a search on the subject of "Lynx fur".
11 posted on 09/17/2002 1:02:54 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
Over 2 years ago I (accurately) predicted that if Bush were elected the ozone hole would start to close. Having reached its biggest opening of record during the Clinton years, the answer was obvious: All that oral flatulence, pure BS, and outright lies had to go somewhere, and it had to escape the atmosphere to save us from suffocation. Want to keep the ozone hole small?......elect Republicans! (McAuliffe will cause the hole to open wider than in all history.)
19 posted on 09/17/2002 6:46:45 PM PDT by linton59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson