Whether or not you listen to Pravda. The fact remains that a number of Nuclear Weapons are unaccounted for. This is a recient event, as according to the Clinton Administration, all of the Weapons in Russia WAS accounted for. What happenned between then and now?
1 posted on
09/17/2002 7:17:58 AM PDT by
vannrox
To: vannrox
Terrific! Atomic bombs lost by imbeciles and possibly in the hands of morons. It's a good thing God is watching the store because we certainly aren't...
2 posted on
09/17/2002 7:24:11 AM PDT by
kellynla
To: vannrox
The Soviets were accomplished liars.
They exaggerated everything.
Most likely, they never had the number of weapons that they reported.
To: vannrox
Translation- We need American dollars to look into the situation further.
4 posted on
09/17/2002 7:32:01 AM PDT by
riri
To: vannrox
They're not lost. The nukes are just conveniently tucked away somewhere for safe keeping in case the government needs them.
To: vannrox
Anybody have any hard information on how long nukes stay "fresh"? for example, how long does the neutron initiator remain funcitonal without maintenance? If they're tritium boosted, how long does it take for the tritium to decay to the point where it doesn't boost the yield?
Anybody?
To: vannrox
That's cheerful news
8 posted on
09/17/2002 9:38:40 AM PDT by
Kwilliams
To: vannrox
"...according to the Clinton administration..."
Not a credible source, IMO.
9 posted on
09/18/2002 5:24:53 AM PDT by
airborne
To: vannrox
If Clinton said all were accounted for, then OF COURSE it must be true...like everything else he said. (sarcasm)
To: vannrox; gitmo; Mercuria; AnnaZ; Jeff Head; Balata; michigander; Alamo-Girl; amom; seamole; ...
To: vannrox
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; ATOMIC_PUNK
BumPing
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson