To: redlipstick
Not really, it appeared in print so what? Now the media is without sin?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/649597/posts?page=322#322
Here's the one I posted in March, post 322. Mine is from the wife of a SD cop who participated in the arrest festivities outside of Feldman's office.
My question remains, why is it more credible now?
73 posted on
09/17/2002 7:37:46 AM PDT by
Jaded
To: Jaded
My question remains, why is it more credible now?Because its sourced in a paper that could be held accountable rather than an anon person in internet.
To: Jaded
My guess is it's more credible now because:
now that both portions of the trial are over, and
now that the appellate court has ruled certain matters could not be sealed,
the information is free to come out whereas before it fell under the gag order and/or matters sealed by Judge Mudd.
78 posted on
09/17/2002 7:43:26 AM PDT by
Amore
To: Jaded
That link was a real trip down memory lane. Back when you were still on the fence.
I didn't put much stock in it back then because it was to vague and mixed up with the binocs and other stuff which sounded imbellished as it was endlessly repeated through LE circles.
However this article is very explicit in naming who, when, where, and what, right down to the brand of map handed to the defense lawyers. That at least gives it the appearance of being a more accurate version of the rumor that has been around for 6 months.
To me it's just another rumor that has been confirmed, just like the swinging.
Are you going to stick with the SNDFF side of the fence? It is only going to become more clear that Westerfield is the killer as more information comes out of the unsealed documents and closed hearings.
102 posted on
09/17/2002 8:40:19 AM PDT by
Valpal1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson