[John Jamieson]

Dusek did his best to confuse the jury and he succeeded, but the bugsperts actual were all in quite good agreement. I studied their testimony very carefully and and even repeated some of their calculations, to better understand them.

[marajade]

"Dusek did his best to confuse the jury and he succeeded ..."

The bug experts themselves stated that their findings were NOT scientific. Are you going to discount DNA evidence that was presented, which is scientific, and vote to acquit based on an experts own finding of it being not scientific?