[CharacterCounts]

It's a technicality I agree, but if DW didn't act alone, the jury should have found him not guilty because he was charged as the lone perp. Any CA lawyers that can verify this?

Don't think so. Even if the Jury felt there might be accomplices, they could still find him guilty as long as the evidence established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

[John Jamieson]

Dusek won anway, but it wasn't obvious in the middle of the trial. Why didn't he suggest that an accomplise might explain the lack of evidence in the vD house and the dumping date then?