Replies

It was interesting to see the split (not the DW guilty/not guilty split). There were two sides. One side was the open-minded but suspicious group. The side that tested ALL possibilities, no matter how far out, as they might lead somewhere. The reason they looked for those possibilities was because normal logic and reason said something was wrong with the way the evidence was presented. Something was wrong due to the fact that the victims and the victims witnesses continually lied to police. Something was wrong because witnesses for the Prosecution repeatedly told the COURT that police did not copy down STATEMENTS correctly. Maybe DW really killed Danielle but why was everything being done wrong? Why were people lying? Why the police lying?

This side believed that there was some corruption involved. That there were external reasons, such as the DA's need to win the re-election bid, that caused such chicanery in this trial. This side believed that justice was being perverted and that members of Free Republic were in a fight to prevent this perversion.

A side that believed that the JUDGE should not be allowed to give TESTIMONY during a case. A side that believed that the term SHE IS DEAD, THEREFORE HE DID IT, is not the way our justice system should be run.

The other side seems to believe that it doesn't matter about the METHOD, only the RESULTS. The other side made a decision at the beginning based on what the media told them to believe and they have stuck with it no matter what. They got their RESULTS and that is all they are interested in.

Now they are cheefully being massaged by the media , ensuring them that all is right in the world, and the BAD guy really is the bad guy, and he is behind bars. Go back to sleep, nothing to worry about.

This case had nothing to do with loss of your freedoms. The precedents set will never be used against you. Our justice system is not being eroded. Go back to sleep.

Gee, that's funny! According to your division, I started out in the suspicious Group A but ended up in the DW-is-guilty Group B. But that's impossible according to you :- )

I think your theory is deeply flawed by your personal bias.

Totally agree. I also don't think it's over. Lots of new information to come about this case.

After editing and re-editing..the only thing I can say is that you have really made your side look good. :)