Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
"A wrist slap in exchange for his father's life?"

Why didn't he just lie and save his father, then? The answer is, it wouldn't have any difference to the jury.
269 posted on 09/17/2002 1:24:10 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]


To: All
Many of the talking heads yesterday said the judge is very unlikely to overthrow the jury's sentence. They said it had only happen once or twice in CA. What they didn't say (or maybe didn't know) was that Judge Mudd was the one that did it several years ago.
271 posted on 09/17/2002 1:28:56 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
Why didn't he just lie and save his father, then?

Because he swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

274 posted on 09/17/2002 1:33:25 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
Neither Neil or the defense attorney's had anyway of predicting what would or would not affect the jury. Geez.

Neil denied responsibility for the kiddie porn because it was the truth, maybe because truth telling is what you're supposed to do? Especially under oath!

275 posted on 09/17/2002 1:38:21 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson