[John Jamieson]

So you're convienced that not only did DW do it, but he did it alone?

I'm not. The best explaination of all the evidence (and the lack of evidence in the VD house) to me, is that DW was involved, but someone else was too. If someone else was involved, DW may be an accessory, not a killer. If we consider the case closed, we may miss another perp(s) and be leaving more young girls in danger.

I won't be happy until the whole story is known.

Getting half the cancer doesn't cure you.

[Valpal1]

I do believe he acted alone.

He would out an accomplice in a heart beat, especially if the accomplice was the actual killer.

Please don't say he is covering for his son, who has a handful of alibi witnesses.

Not for one minute do I believe there is anyone on the face of this planet that he cares about more than himself, to cover for them in throughout this trial.

[VRWC_minion]

If someone else was involved, DW may be an accessory, not a killer.

The best evidence that there was no accessory is that Westerfield didn't attempt to enter into a plea bargain. He could use the information to avoid a death sentence. If he was willing to throw his inncocent son to the wolves surely he would sell out an accomplice to save his life.

[let freedom sing]

If we consider the case closed, we may miss another perp(s) and be leaving more young girls in danger. I won't be happy until the whole story is known. Getting half the cancer doesn't cure you.

We KNOW there are more perps who won't care a twit, except about getting caught.

The cancerous VD "private" lifestyle is still intact-- no possible cure there, either. Where is CPS when you need them, kids?