[Valpal1]

If you're looking for an accomplice, may I recommend his ex BIL "Cletus" to you to fill the position.

You are wrong about the accuracy of the bugs. Anomalies are a dime a dozen in the natural world and entymologists have not studied every environmental factor possible, nor is it possible to "know" every invironmental factor to draw the window of possibility so tight as to exclude DW as the dumper.

Not one of the bug-sperts testified beyond "likely" and "unlikely" time frames. That was weak in comparison to the blood, hair, print that positively place the victim in DW's property, for which there was no adequate refutation.

"Might have" snuck in and played there 4-12 moths previously, without witnesses or other evidence isn't a refutation, it is just a pathetic, desperate grasp at straw.

The 3rd possiblity is that the Forensic Entymologists have a lot more studies to do, to figure out what they missed.

[Freedom2specul8]

whoa...have you been thinking about the bil for awhile?

[John Jamieson]

Re Cletus, I wouldn't rule anyone out.

If I had been on the jury it would have been hung. On the other hand, the three times I tried to get on juries they threw me off as soon as I said "engineer". I think I'm off the list completely now!