To: It's me
No, this one story doesn't make me think differently, IM.
But thanks for the nice words, I think. :-)
People here can post what they want, but it's too bad so many words have been written in anger and meaness over the past 24 hours.
Lots more stories will be coming out, some sensible, some not. DW is still welcome to my home, assuming he ever sees sunshine again.
To: pinz-n-needlez
I mean this in all sincerity, not sarcasm. I certainly hope you don't have any young children in your home.
127 posted on
09/17/2002 9:54:19 AM PDT by
Amore
To: pinz-n-needlez
This morning:
The van Dams said they had no knowledge of any deal, surely they would have have been asked for their input.
Brenda first said she wanted to know "why" he did it and then changed her mind to "how" did he do it. Duh!
The books about this case should be coming soon, I can't wait.
I studied the bug guys testimony for many hours and understand their math and logic. It is not reasonable to ignore them. There are just 2 possibilities:
1. DW is innocent.
2. He had help.
Either way, Damielle's killer(s) are still out there.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson