Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | September 17, 2002 | J. Harry Jones

Posted on 09/17/2002 5:28:16 AM PDT by Bug

Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found

By J. Harry Jones
STAFF WRITER

September 17, 2002


Minutes before Danielle van Dam's remains were found Feb. 27, David Westerfield's lawyers were brokering a deal with prosecutors:

He would tell police where he dumped the 7-year-old girl's body; they would not seek the death penalty.

Law enforcement sources told The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday defense lawyers Steven Feldman and Robert Boyce were negotiating for a life sentence for the 50-year-old design engineer, a neighbor of the van Dams in Sabre Springs.

The deal they were discussing would have allowed Westerfield to plead guilty to murder and be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, said the officials, who spoke on condition they not be identified.

Prosecutors were seriously considering the bargain when Danielle's body was discovered off Dehesa Road that afternoon, nearly four weeks after she disappeared from her bedroom.

"The deal was just minutes away," one of the sources said.

It was aborted, but details were confirmed yesterday soon after a San Diego Superior Court jury recommended the death penalty for Westerfield.

The officials outlined this chronology:

Feldman and Boyce were at the downtown San Diego jail discussing the final arrangements with Westerfield when volunteer searchers found Danielle's remains beneath trees along Dehesa Road east of El Cajon.

When the lawyers left to meet with prosecutors, they noticed members of the news media gathering in the street and asked what was happening.

After being told a body had been found, they went directly to the nearby Hall of Justice and met with prosecutors. The defense lawyers were handed a copy of a Thomas Guide map of the Dehesa area on which a circle had been drawn indicating the location of the body.

Feldman and Boyce took the map back to Westerfield and later telephoned to say they no longer "had anything to discuss regarding a plea bargain."

Neither Feldman nor Boyce could be reached for comment last night.

Danielle was reported missing from her home the morning of Feb. 2, and Westerfield, who lived two doors away, quickly became the primary suspect. He was watched closely by police for weeks as authorities and volunteers searched from the Sabre Springs neighborhood to the Imperial County desert.

After DNA results linked Westerfield to the crime, he was arrested Feb. 22 and charged with kidnapping and burglary.

Three days later, even though Danielle's body had not been found, District Attorney Paul Pfingst announced murder and kidnapping charges would be filed that could carry the death penalty.

Many law enforcement officials feared Danielle's body might never be found. Then, on Feb. 27, volunteer searchers combing the Dehesa area, far from where police had focused, found Danielle's badly decomposed remains.

At that point, the official sources said yesterday, any opportunity Westerfield and his lawyers had to win a plea bargain evaporated.


J. Harry Jones: (619) 542-4590;

email

Copyright 2002 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 641-655 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I would sincerely hope all the naysayers out there feel pretty silly now that this has come out...

But maybe I'm just getting my hopes up...

Remember how I got creamed because I thought he was guilty just on the fingerprints alone?
501 posted on 09/17/2002 9:01:04 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
That was the welcoming committee don't ya know.

Maybe it's just me. But I think that anyone who sits on the side without pointing out the problem is PART of the PROBLEM. There were a lot of problems here and no one that I know of (there may have been some) from the Westerfield crowd minded the massacre.

502 posted on 09/17/2002 9:01:31 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: JLO
Yes, the jury has spoken. Now, I want to know if anyone else is involved.
503 posted on 09/17/2002 9:01:46 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Yes it did drive people away. But you know what? Some folks are not use to defending their position and take it hard when they are forced to. My oldest daughter took debate courses..and one of the major things they did was prepare prepare prepare do defend their stances. The hardest thing they had to do was defend that which they did not agree with. YikEs. Can you imagine switching sides just to see what it's like in this case?
504 posted on 09/17/2002 9:02:07 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Well, my definition of lively discussion excluded the insults. :(
505 posted on 09/17/2002 9:02:55 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"Now, I want to know if anyone else is involved."

Give it up man... it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference...

506 posted on 09/17/2002 9:03:06 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Not unremitting, but too often, and I've defended her, when I saw it. I think she is really tough, but a sweetheart underneath it all.

I'm happy to hear of your support. But your most vocal members of the Westerfield Club were the biggest offenders. What exactly was their problem?

507 posted on 09/17/2002 9:03:26 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"What exactly was their problem?"

Please don't take this the wrong way because I'm teasing but they came across as some kind of cultists...
508 posted on 09/17/2002 9:04:28 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Tell Kim that I already have a "Cretin" award named after me. I am not willing to share the Title.

... Being called cretin is not so funny. But what is the best response? Generally I look to Winston Churchill for advice in being rejected. He would say .... well what he would say is pretty obvious and I'm not doing him any honor by repeating it in this present context. That's my advice.

And here's my own advice: Hang in there. Do what you think is right, but avoid worrying about any conspiracies against you. Bop if banged and bang if bopped. Don't save up any bops and bangs for later use -- they don't age well at all. And you don't have to bop or bang back when banged or bopped a lot of times. Don't send someone else to do your bopping or banging for you. If you can't do it yourself, don't bother at all.

This is a ramble, I'm up too late.

509 posted on 09/17/2002 9:05:22 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Please don't take this the wrong way because I'm teasing but they came across as some kind of cultists...

I agree absolutely. That's why I call them the "Squeakies" after Squeaky Fromm.

510 posted on 09/17/2002 9:07:16 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: marajade
"feel pretty silly now"

Why would anyone feel silly because of information that was NOT available at the time of their decision making?

I don't that agree yet that DW "confessed", but if he did it doesn't bother me. My argument was with inadequate evidence during the trial to convince me of his guilt.

Maybe I just have a higher standard of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" than most people.
511 posted on 09/17/2002 9:09:34 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"That's why I call them the "Squeakies" after Squeaky Fromm."

LOL

512 posted on 09/17/2002 9:10:04 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
There was enough information out there without this to come to the same conclusion as the jury did...
513 posted on 09/17/2002 9:10:51 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: marajade
"it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference..."

It could save some young childs life.
514 posted on 09/17/2002 9:12:01 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"Maybe I just have a higher standard of 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' than most people."

Well as a juror you follow the judges instructions as to what constitutes reasonable doubt because if you don't you fail to do what you are sworn to do as a juror.

515 posted on 09/17/2002 9:12:17 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Yes, for many people, but not all.
516 posted on 09/17/2002 9:12:44 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"It could save some young childs life."

Did you hear to read about any evidence that either side presented that supports your theory?

517 posted on 09/17/2002 9:13:08 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
It wouldn't matter if there were others because the aider and abettor doctrine in Calif. makes aiders and abettors liable for their accomplices' actions as well as their own. "It obviates the necessity to decide who was the aider and abettor and who the direct perpetrator or to what extent each played which role." People v. McCoy, 24 P.3d 1210, 1215-17 (Cal. 2001).
518 posted on 09/17/2002 9:13:50 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"Yes, for many people, but not all."

See my post 515
519 posted on 09/17/2002 9:13:54 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"But I think that anyone who sits on the side without pointing out the problem is PART of the PROBLEM."

That's a fair statement... unfortunately, there was the one for all and all for one mentality. Bring on the wrath of the thread monster if you dare correct anyone in public. :-\

520 posted on 09/17/2002 9:14:02 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson