Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | September 17, 2002 | J. Harry Jones

Posted on 09/17/2002 5:28:16 AM PDT by Bug

Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found

By J. Harry Jones
STAFF WRITER

September 17, 2002


Minutes before Danielle van Dam's remains were found Feb. 27, David Westerfield's lawyers were brokering a deal with prosecutors:

He would tell police where he dumped the 7-year-old girl's body; they would not seek the death penalty.

Law enforcement sources told The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday defense lawyers Steven Feldman and Robert Boyce were negotiating for a life sentence for the 50-year-old design engineer, a neighbor of the van Dams in Sabre Springs.

The deal they were discussing would have allowed Westerfield to plead guilty to murder and be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, said the officials, who spoke on condition they not be identified.

Prosecutors were seriously considering the bargain when Danielle's body was discovered off Dehesa Road that afternoon, nearly four weeks after she disappeared from her bedroom.

"The deal was just minutes away," one of the sources said.

It was aborted, but details were confirmed yesterday soon after a San Diego Superior Court jury recommended the death penalty for Westerfield.

The officials outlined this chronology:

Feldman and Boyce were at the downtown San Diego jail discussing the final arrangements with Westerfield when volunteer searchers found Danielle's remains beneath trees along Dehesa Road east of El Cajon.

When the lawyers left to meet with prosecutors, they noticed members of the news media gathering in the street and asked what was happening.

After being told a body had been found, they went directly to the nearby Hall of Justice and met with prosecutors. The defense lawyers were handed a copy of a Thomas Guide map of the Dehesa area on which a circle had been drawn indicating the location of the body.

Feldman and Boyce took the map back to Westerfield and later telephoned to say they no longer "had anything to discuss regarding a plea bargain."

Neither Feldman nor Boyce could be reached for comment last night.

Danielle was reported missing from her home the morning of Feb. 2, and Westerfield, who lived two doors away, quickly became the primary suspect. He was watched closely by police for weeks as authorities and volunteers searched from the Sabre Springs neighborhood to the Imperial County desert.

After DNA results linked Westerfield to the crime, he was arrested Feb. 22 and charged with kidnapping and burglary.

Three days later, even though Danielle's body had not been found, District Attorney Paul Pfingst announced murder and kidnapping charges would be filed that could carry the death penalty.

Many law enforcement officials feared Danielle's body might never be found. Then, on Feb. 27, volunteer searchers combing the Dehesa area, far from where police had focused, found Danielle's badly decomposed remains.

At that point, the official sources said yesterday, any opportunity Westerfield and his lawyers had to win a plea bargain evaporated.


J. Harry Jones: (619) 542-4590;

email

Copyright 2002 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-655 next last
To: bvw
While => Well,
481 posted on 09/17/2002 8:35:21 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: marajade
If this is the case, the print will come out tomorrow and the naysayers summarily drummed into the ground.
482 posted on 09/17/2002 8:35:46 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Oh and it was all too obvious why they resorted to vanity flames.
483 posted on 09/17/2002 8:38:13 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: drlevy88
Well Court TV has an article. This paper has an article in this thread. And Fox News is reporting it. I don't think we have to wait until tomorrow as to its truth...
484 posted on 09/17/2002 8:40:22 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Where's the official police statement, however? It is way too hot an item NOT to have such a statement. There has to be a reason Feldman insisted that the appeal of the case would "not be tried in the media of San Diego."
485 posted on 09/17/2002 8:42:29 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/752377/posts?page=44#44

new thread if you missed it.
486 posted on 09/17/2002 8:43:09 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: drlevy88
All three are citing law enforcement as sources...
487 posted on 09/17/2002 8:44:16 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Your probably right, a lot of the trouble started with hit-and-run trouble makers.

Most of the regulars enjoy a lively discussion/debate.

That's why we spend so many hours on here, it would be very dull if we all agreed.
488 posted on 09/17/2002 8:47:15 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: drlevy88
revealing these things would help ease the minds of those trial watchers who are afraid he's "innocent".
489 posted on 09/17/2002 8:47:37 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: Bug
I caught unmitigated s**t when I said that there was tons of evidence against him. Hope those folks choke on their words now.
490 posted on 09/17/2002 8:47:42 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
"Hope those folks choke on their words now."

It certainly should give them pause in their undying support that he was innocent...

491 posted on 09/17/2002 8:49:20 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: bvw
The personal attacks were first and most often from the hang-Westerfield side. After a while the "presume him innocent and prove him guilty beyond any reasonable doubt" crowd, on account of and in response to having suffered incessant barrages of personal attacks, became extra wary of any Westerfield is guilty poster and took to preemptive strike first and ask questions later tactics. Now it is close to a balance of terror, but the hang 'im high crowd has been favored by local moderators, and many due process zealots have moved on.

Wrong.

Just this morning one of the Westerfield groupies called Kim a "cretin".

Your side seems to relish this sort of attack.

492 posted on 09/17/2002 8:50:38 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Most of the regulars enjoy a lively discussion/debate.

You're one of the regulars. And did you not see an unremitting attack on Kim?

493 posted on 09/17/2002 8:52:38 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"And did you not see an unremitting attack on Kim?"

I saw it and I got it too...

494 posted on 09/17/2002 8:53:35 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Very true JJ..
495 posted on 09/17/2002 8:54:38 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Hia - I was in the same frame of mind as you - for months. I think it's time to give it up.

He's guilty.
496 posted on 09/17/2002 8:56:36 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I saw it and I got it too...

So did I ... and I left. The Westerfield Fan Club drive lots of Freepers away.

497 posted on 09/17/2002 8:57:01 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: marajade
That was the welcoming committee don't ya know. :)

498 posted on 09/17/2002 8:57:17 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Very true JJ..

And you were the target. No?

499 posted on 09/17/2002 8:58:29 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Not unremitting, but too often, and I've defended her, when I saw it. I think she is really tough, but a sweetheart underneath it all.
500 posted on 09/17/2002 8:58:35 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson