O.K. maybe I over reacted. Obviously I would have the same problem with anyone taking the position that Eunice must be lying as I would with someone taking that position vis-a-vis the med students. The dispute concerns a matter of fact, not of political ideology. In bristling at your incidental CINO labeling I was overlooking your justified criticism of the dogmatic anti-Eunice contigent. I only want to hear all the opinions and incidental facts on this matter. It seem way too soon to me to be shutting one side down.
Thanks for the sort of retraction. Yes, you did go over the top. What kind of a " Conservative " would cxlaim that Eunice not only lied, but that he heard her say, what no one else did, and that the 3 shlubs only began claiming
tonight There ARE known facts, in this case; as well as posted on FR lies, misquotes, and opinions. I won't stand for someone/s telling me that a fact isn't a fact and that only THEY know what was said. Neither do I respect anyone claiming to be a Conservative, talking like a Dem, a full blown Marxist, or a moderate Dem. I have seen some do that here. They are CINOS . Case closed. :-)