That's bull. There are objective facts, and conflicting testimony as to those facts. None of this has a single thing to do with being conservative or not. I don't know who's telling the truth and neither do you, so quit wagging your finger, and that goes for the rest of the knee-jerk-rah-rah-Eunice-the-Muslims-are-obviously-liars crowd.
I don't have a problem with people having an opinion about what they think is probably true, or more likely to be true. But I do have a problem when people begin acting like clymers because someone is willing to look at the other side, or both sides, of a moot issue. Fact is, if I were forced to place a bet on the matter, I would bet on the accuracy of Eunice's account, but I'm not being compelled, and won't be compelled, to make a final or presumptive judgement unless and until the facts so compel me.
You have an opinion, and that's fine, but either get down off your high-horse and debate it fairly, without the "CINO" ad hominems, or let it be and ride off.
There ARE CINOS on this site. They aren't Conservatives at all ; yet, they claim that they are. You don't own this forum, so don't attempt to give me any orders, which don't appear to be posted rules, by the owner. GOT THAT ?
Oh gee, another damned , little Holier Than Thou , know-it-all. Have you seen my knees jerking ? You use a crytal ball or tarot cards or an Ouija board ? Take a good look , at yourself , in the nearest mirror, to see a hypocritical finger wagger, dear. :-)