Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
I noticed no one complained about the driver becoming unemployed. Why? Because no one wants the lives of their children dependant on the ability of a dope smoker to drive.

But many here seem to think that a different standard applies when this person is not driving the bus, and is merely in posession of a collection of firearms and sufficient ammunition to create mayhem.

No one has questioned the ability to these folks to teach gun safety.

It is pretty much a given that the firearms were around while they were using drugs. Maybe this person was straight and sober when driving the bus.

I don't like the caprice, with which, in some instances confiscation seems to be conducted, but in all honesty, this would make a lousy test case.

96 posted on 09/18/2002 12:46:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
"It is pretty much a given that the firearms were around while they were using drugs. Maybe this person was straight and sober when driving the bus."

There is ZERO evidence that there was any at all drug use. Drug possession, yes. According the the blurb, the individual was given the drugs by an old friend who WAS a user. This could be readily proven or disproven by a blood test (there are VERY sensitive tests for tetrahydrocannibol. I missed the part about him losing his job, as the title was about firearms. Total bullbleep to lose your job over less than half an ounce of marijuana.

I suspect some of their other bus drivers DRINK on weekends--why aren't THEY fired??

98 posted on 09/18/2002 2:57:43 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson