Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Minute Discrepancy in Flight 93 Tape
Philadelphia Daily News ^ | Sept. 16, 2002 | William Bunch

Posted on 09/16/2002 5:34:36 AM PDT by ConservativeNewsJunkie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: NorthGA
The WTC planes didn't have passengers trying to win back the plane as best I can tell. If the cockpit was breached by the passengers, it would not surprise me to learn the terrorists pulled the breakers in an effort to make a rescue impossible.
101 posted on 09/16/2002 9:51:47 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Terminal velocity through the atmosphere is approximately 150 mph, depending on the aerodynamic properties of the falling body.

Puh-leeze. The "falling body" in this case is an airframe DESIGNED TO TRAVEL RAPIDLY THROUGH THE ATMOSPHERE. Its terminal velocity would be fairly close to Mach 1.

102 posted on 09/16/2002 9:52:25 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Terminal velocity through the atmosphere is approximately 150 mph, depending on the aerodynamic properties of the falling body

You are a ding dong. Yes that is ad hominem.

"Terminal velocity" for any airliner under power or not will be far in excess of 150mph. By it's nature, an aircraft does not need to be below stall speeed to "fall out of the sky"....it can also "fly into the ground."

At 500mph, 40,000 feet is less than a minute. If the aircraft was "flying erratically and losing altitude" after turning around....then it was not at 40,000 feet.

103 posted on 09/16/2002 9:54:51 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So...you would rather focus on that one little part...than the fact you have no clue as to what you are talking about in the numbers? Try this on for size partner: You don't care if you are wrong...because you just want the conspiracy story to prevail.

Again...my issue was not with any other detail...I am just telling you that you have no clue about flying operations if you think the only person on that base who would know if an AIM-9 is missing off the wingtip is the pilot.

That was the point of my post...not the other. Nice of you to not even mention or debate the other stuff I said. So before you start accusing someone of having an agenda...maybe you ought to haul your rump up off from the indents in your chair and go look in the mirror.

104 posted on 09/16/2002 9:58:51 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
So what's to stop a fighter from being diverted to a quiet little spot with no pesky observers once it has fired a missile?
105 posted on 09/16/2002 10:38:20 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Puh-leeze. The "falling body" in this case is an airframe DESIGNED TO TRAVEL RAPIDLY THROUGH THE ATMOSPHERE. Its terminal velocity would be fairly close to Mach 1.

Do you have any references for that, or did you just pull it out of thin air?

106 posted on 09/16/2002 10:39:38 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Yeah, and they didn't mention the possibility that it was shot down by a flying saucer piloted by space aliens, either.

You're right. You are the only wacko to mention that possibility.

107 posted on 09/16/2002 10:40:33 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I'm at an alert base...one of only 7 in the country at the time. The fighters returned to their bases. If you think keeping it a secret when they returned without missles was tough...more so when they don't come back at all. For one thing...all the ATC people and the NEADS/SEADS/WADS people would know where they went...and that is a lot of people.

Look...this is not worth my discussion. When I said it doesn't matter...that was not a revelation of my hidden agenda...which is what you accused me off...but a statement of my feelings on it being a military man. My opinion is it doesn't matter because they were going to die anyway and I think that they all would have preferred death by F-16 than death by White House/Capitol Building...so to me (and maybe only to me...but guess what...IT IS America and I can chose) it doesn't matter. The only thing I have an issue with is the nobody would know. Again...this is America and you choose your own opinion. It is obvious that you are doing the EXACT thing you accused me of: Having an agenda and one's mind made up in hopes to see that opinion prevail.

Therefore...There is no further need of discussion amongst us.

108 posted on 09/16/2002 10:51:13 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
Suits me. Now get back to work at Langley where you belong.
109 posted on 09/16/2002 10:57:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hey, dipwad, I've got a question for you. Assuming that you are correct and this is a big coverup, why wouldn't the big wicked dark gov't conspiracy just say that the tape ended at 10:06 instead of 10:03? They control all the data, so why wouldn't they just make it come out all neat and clean for you?
110 posted on 09/16/2002 11:02:27 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Hey, dipwad, I've got a question for you. Assuming that you are correct and this is a big coverup, why wouldn't the big wicked dark gov't conspiracy just say that the tape ended at 10:06 instead of 10:03? They control all the data, so why wouldn't they just make it come out all neat and clean for you?

Because they're counting on spitwads like you to say it doesn't matter.

111 posted on 09/16/2002 11:04:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Great non-answer.
112 posted on 09/16/2002 11:05:31 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Well you did say it doesn't matter.
113 posted on 09/16/2002 11:06:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Where? Please provide a quote from me to that effect. Or, failing that, acknowledge another one of your lies.
114 posted on 09/16/2002 11:11:47 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Terminal velocity through the atmosphere is approximately 150 mph, depending on the aerodynamic properties of the falling body.

That's terminal velocity for a falling HUMAN body. Not very aerodynamic. A nice smooth object will fall faster...

115 posted on 09/16/2002 11:14:55 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: null and void
A nice smooth object will fall faster...

Aircraft debris does not tend to be very smooth.

116 posted on 09/16/2002 11:15:46 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
In fact, the entire premise that flight 93 was shot down would not even exist at all unless massive amounts of people knew that flight 93 was actually trailed by armed fighter jets that had actually asked for and had actually been given permission to take it down

Name one of these people...

117 posted on 09/16/2002 11:16:27 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chris_in_nj
Thank you Chris. God bless you and yours.

The passengers of Flt 93 make me proud to be an American.
118 posted on 09/16/2002 11:22:18 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: irish guard
The plane was at a much lower altitude than that. Read that Tom Brokaw interview with the 9-11 flight controllers over on MSNBC. It's a heart-breaking story, but in every case, the first thing the hijackers did was abruptly bring the plane to a much lower altitude, from the 30,000 ft or so cruising altitude to under 10,000 feet.

And I believe that one of the Pennsylvania eyewitnesses said that his attention was first drawn to the plane because it was unusually low.

119 posted on 09/16/2002 11:28:21 AM PDT by Black Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: altayann
The likeliest reason that the tape ended three minutes before the plane hit the ground is that the plane itself came to a end three minutes before hitting the ground.

If it was hit by a missle, there wouldn't be enough left of the plane to hit the ground with such force. If it was crippled by being shot at and then crashed, odds are the recorder would still be working as the plane fell to the ground.

120 posted on 09/16/2002 11:28:26 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson