Why don't you look at the real facts, like the Commonwealth V Sharpless case I quoted above. Where several men were prosecuted and Convicted for Pornography.
And O.J. was deemed "not guilty" in court. Now what were you saying about the legitimacy of the courts. The founding fathers were wrong to permit slavery as put forth in the constitution.
And you believe the founding fathers and drafters of the constitution and the bill of rights intended for naked people parading around for money and someone else's jollies qualifies as SPEECH?10
Yes. They had pornography back in those days, yet the founding fathers and drafters of the constitution and the bill of rights knew that it shouldn't be outlawed -- so they didn't. Your "argument" is childish at best.42
YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR MIND!!!
Yelling hinders/diminishes your argument. Obviously you not even been through debate tactics101 course. Probably still stuck in child tantrum state.
I suppose you think every law and all government-won court trials equals just laws and just application of the laws. You don't, (you can correct me if that is wrong) and you're just as wrong to pick and chose that which suits your agenda rather than standing on honest principles.
And you...you would neeeever "pick and choose that which suits your agenda". Nope. Never. Not in a million, billion, trillion years! LOL
Haven't you had your ass kicked enough times already with this pseudo-intellectual bull$shit (i.e. abortion debates, drug legalization)??