[BulletBrasDotNet]

A picture of a naked women is a "horrible thing." You better tell some of the world's greatest artists.

[traditionalist]

A picture of a naked women is a "horrible thing." You better tell some of the world's greatest artists.

Nudity is not necessarily pornography. Vulgar depictions of human sexuality is.

[Tribune7]

Pornography is something designed to cause sexual arousal. This means that a photo of a girl in a bathing suit on a beach can arguably be called "pornography." Nobody is really suggesting this be outlawed, or regulated.

What I think most people are upset about and which is very destructive of our culture is acts relating to sex which have traditionally been defined as "obscene."

I don't have any problem with making depictions of these acts illegal using a national, rather than community, standards.

And obscenity is not, nor has it ever been, protected by the First Amendment.

[JZoback]

A picture of a naked women is a "horrible thing." You better tell some of the world's greatest artists.

There are several artists who could be the "world's greatest artists" you cite and I seriously doubt they would paint women the same way Larry Flint would pose them.