Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does Porn Get a Pass?
Patric Henry Center for Individual Liberty ^ | 8/29/2002 | Gary Aldrich

Posted on 09/15/2002 10:28:57 AM PDT by traditionalist

Let’s talk about the facts of life. It’s a fact of life that we have lost the war to control pornography. The war was over years ago when the Supreme Court ruled that porn was legal if it met community standards. Whatever Conservatives or American society in general wished to do about this growing wave of filth has been for naught. It’s saddening to admit, but it’s true.

During the Reagan administration, I was part of a nationwide effort to try to make a dent in the pornography industry. The FBI had hard evidence that organized crime (OC) had moved into the pornography industry, just as they had into gambling, prostitution and drugs. OC thrives on the vices of humans.

After a year-long undercover case that more than proved the OC connection to porn, we brought forward our indictments. At that time, the community standard that allows federal prosecutions for obscene material gave us the hammer to put away many OC thugs – even the Liberal Miami juries agreed that some of the material being sold was a bit over the top. We fined these sleaze merchants heavily and sent them to the slammer.

You know what? We didn’t even make a dent.

Today, that same kind of material is routinely displayed on hundreds of Internet websites advertising their wares in an effort to get you to pay a fee to “peek” inside. What’s inside must really be filthy, but if it isn’t considered child porn, it won’t be prosecuted. Eight years of Bill Clinton in the White House and Janet Reno in the Department of Justice guaranteed that every community standard in the nation has been lowered. Today, both federal and local prosecutions of routine porn are a lost cause.

Whatever objections we had as a society to this porn garbage are moot at this point.

Hundreds of billions of dollars are made each year on the “sales” of horrible things, images that most of us want to keep away not only from our children, but from our communities. We want to keep this material from finding its way into the very fabric of our society. Yet, there is an enormous appetite for this stuff – so much so that it’s obvious that the flow from producer to consumer cannot be controlled. Conservatives need to understand this. We have lost this war, but is there something positive that can come from this? Do we just “give up,” or is there some way we can curtail the amount of porn being produced?

You bet there is, and here’s the answer: Tax the living daylights out of it! Tax every part of it. Tax the consumers who want to look at it. Tax the “actors” – mostly women, and some men – who are making money being “models” for these porn sites. Tax every network that allows this human sewage to flow through their switches, cables, phone lines – tax any entity that makes it easy for this material to go from camera lens to your living room where little Johnny can see it while you’re out at the grocery store.

Call it a Porn Tax.

Tax them federally, and tax them at the state level as well. Tax them county and tax them local. Tax them until it hurts, and tax them until they scream. Then, tax them right out of business.

Impossible you say? Wait a minute! Isn’t this the reasoning behind the tax on cigarettes? Cigarettes are considered to be a threat to the well being of humans. Is filthy pornography less of a threat to the minds and emotional well-being of humans?

We also tax alcohol heavily, reasoning that a heavy tax keeps the prices up, and thus, maybe out of the hands of too many drunks. As a society, we recognize that booze is not the best way to have a good time, but we acknowledge that it cannot be stopped, so we heavily regulate it, and we tax the grapes out of it!

Why does porn get a pass?

Regulating and taxing cigarettes is not a signal that society approves of the production, distribution and use of tobacco products – just the opposite is true. Our society has begun to frown on the use of cigarettes and has outlawed their use in many public places, including restaurants and bars in some states, yet we throw up our hands and claim impotence in our efforts to control porn. We can’t even keep it out of our public libraries! It seems we are unable to think of any solution, so we do nothing.

From now on, unless we have some kind of revolution or the installation of a dictator who has the power to chop off the hands of those who possess or produce porn, it’s here, and it’s widely available. Get over it! Sure you can regret that we cannot control this. Of course, you can do your best to keep it out of your life. I’m not saying we should give any indication at all that we accept this horrible environment that has been thrust upon us.

Most of us hate this deep injury to our civility. The least we can do is think of some way to lessen it.

Let’s face another fact: women are ill-served by allowing themselves to be filmed while performing the most intimate of activities, but they sure aren’t victims! There are thousands of them, maybe hundreds of thousands of women, young and old, who for some reason think it’s just fine to be a part of this scourge.

Being ill-served and engaging in harmful, risky activity has never stopped prostitutes from doing what they do. Obvious facts about the dangers are not going to stop the actors and actresses from appearing in porn flicks. But, we can lay on a heavy financial burden, just like we tax anyone else who’s engaged in a high profit enterprise. Maybe fewer will be available if we make it tough enough. Let’s take away the financial benefit.

At a time when government officials are pulling out all the stops to dream up taxes and penalties that honest, hardworking, decent citizens must pay, this idea seems like a no-brainer. If they can put cameras on tops of poles to catch those who run red lights, don’t tell me they can’t figure out how to tax porn and all who benefit from it.

Let’s tax porn back into the dark alley where it belongs.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: firstamendment; porn; pornography; socialvirtue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-248 last
To: Windsong

You speak for your NT cult, so hence, you speak foe those that develop the website. Their views = YOUR views.

You don't like their Web site, fine. That you're a proponent of guilt by association, that's irrational and dishonest.

Ending Lawyer-Like Dishonesties #4

Let's Call Neo-Tech a Cult

Perhaps the most-obvious, lawyer-like dishonesty archived throughout Internet search engines is the assertion that Neo-Tech is a cult. Neo-Tech is not only the antithesis of cults, but is the tool that vanishes them. ...Neo-Tech is based on wide-scope accountability and fully integrated honesty, while cults are based on narrow-scope restrictions and manipulated deceptions. Consider the following dozen contrasts between Neo-Tech and cults:

  1. Neo-Tech has no members or leaders. Cults exist through members and leaders.
  2. Neo-Tech requires crossing boundaries to generate ever expanding knowledge. Cults prohibit crossing boundaries to protect ever stagnant dogmas.
  3. Neo-Tech generates open-ended wealth for individuals and society. Cults dissipate wealth earned by others and society.
  4. Neo-Tech is anchored in factual reality. Cults float in imagined mysticisms.
  5. Neo-Tech holds the individual self and natural law -- one's own self and objective law -- as the only authorities to guide man's life. Neo-Tech (1) posits self-responsibility as a primary of conscious life and (2) rejects the concepts of political-agenda "laws", collectivist "leaders", and external "authorities". With Neo-Tech, conscious beings become self-leaders, allowing no outside "authority" to rule their lives. By contrast, cult members demand that their leader and his group-agenda "laws" rule their lives.
  6. Neo-Tech seeks out its errors in order to correct them. Cults evade their errors in order to propagate them.
  7. Neo-Tech yields productive interactions with others and life. Cults demand harmful withdrawals from nonmembers and life.
  8. Many people avoid or attack Neo-Tech because its integrated honesty exposes their own irrationalities and destructiveness. Cultists avoid or attack society because the real world exposes their cult's irrationalities and destructiveness.
  9. Neo-Tech brings growth, prosperity, and life to individuals. Cults bring restrictions, stagnation, and death to individuals.
  10. Neo-Tech spreads social benefits through integrated honesty and competitive business. Cults spread social harms by manipulating their victims through dishonesty and frauds.
  11. Neo-Tech propagates individual freedom. Cults propagate group oppression.
  12. Neo-Tech will prevail in the 21st century. Cults will vanish in the 21st century.

Ending Lawyer-Like Dishonesties


241 posted on 09/18/2002 8:01:11 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Zon
You don't like their Web site, fine. That you're a proponent of guilt by association, that's dishonest and irrational. Considering that some of your lies have been documented here, that shows a lack of commitment to being a good Christian. Or are your lies you speaking for Christianity according to Windsong's policy of guilt by association.

Interesting that you keep posting this same link over and over and over and over, and yet strangely, I see *zero* freepers taking you up on it. As a matter of fact, I see zero freepers actually taking your side at all in this silly NT nonsense. Guilt by association? You have posted link after link along with all the cut and paste jobs you could muster, and we're supposed to think you actually DONT have an axe to grind with "mysticism" (i.e. Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, etc)? Your founder's websites make it crystal friggin' clear to anyone that they are militantly opposed to Christianity and any belief in a Supreme Being. You know, the same Being who protects our SEALS, Marines, and Army guys out on the front friggin lines that permit *you* to spout all of this athiestic nonsense without fear of being thrown in jail.

One of those agents punched and kicked an editor to the ground, sending him to the hospital with broken ribs. You laugh at people that are working toward curing death.

Cry me a river. You go up against the feds, you had better be prepared for a firefight. They love their jobs. IRS, FBI, CIA, same same when all is said and done. Both have their disgruntled workers here and there.

And judging from your past posts regarding legalized drugs, abortion, porn and science, you in all likelihood wouldn't know a "good Christian" if it bit you on your conceited ass. Just my two and a half cents, mind you. Do the rest of us patriots an enormous favor and attend church one Sunday. You might sample a bit of residue as to what a real Christian is.

242 posted on 09/18/2002 10:13:04 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
Because the Libertarians would throw a hissy fit.
243 posted on 09/18/2002 10:53:56 AM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windsong
Bottom line:

No doubt you too detest The Constitution of the Universe posted at #49  because it doesn't grant government agents nor yourself the power to initiate force against people nor allow you to enlist government agents to initiate force against people on your behalf.

244 posted on 09/18/2002 11:18:30 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Zon
Bottom line: No doubt you too detest The Constitution of the Universe posted at #49 because it doesn't grant government agents nor yourself the power to initiate force against people nor allow you to enlist government agents to initiate force against people on your behalf.

And like any cult automaton, the mindless goop continutes to flow until the Mothership arrives. Are you wearing your Reeboks today, or your Nikes, per Wally's request?

245 posted on 09/18/2002 11:42:48 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: FF578
Prohibition would have worked if we made possession a Capital Offense. We need to do the same for Drug Possession today. Along with Homosexuality, Blasphemy, Fornication, Adultery and Pornography.

I guarentee you that if it was a Capital Crime people would think twice about it.

Alert! Alert! The Taliban has invaded FreeRepublic. Alert! Alert!

246 posted on 09/22/2002 3:11:12 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
And no, porn is not protected by the first amendment, which was intented to protect political dissent and not smut.

The First Amendment was intented to protect the free discourse of any subject.

Case closed

247 posted on 09/22/2002 3:18:23 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
The First Amendment was intented to protect the free discourse of any subject.

So porn is discourse? That's a new one.

248 posted on 09/25/2002 9:48:45 AM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-248 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson