Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
The relevance is, if a older man wishes to date a younger woman, and he is not married, not only is it okay, it is none of our honking business.

Did you read this story? He is IN trouble for doing this. Whether you think it is OK is irrelevant. It obviously was not and he should have known that.

61 posted on 09/15/2002 3:39:42 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
Did you read this story? He is IN trouble for doing this. Whether you think it is OK is irrelevant. It obviously was not and he should have known that.

I don't think we are getting the whole story. There is something else here that is going unmentioned. Was she the 17-year-old version of 'late teen'? Was she an employee of the paper and this became Sexual Harassment? Did he do things on company property or time?

Something else here is going on that they are not mentioning. A May/December romance would not be sufficient to cause dismissal; Certainly not in a Chicago newspaper.

62 posted on 09/15/2002 3:42:05 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson