Skip to comments.
Spectators Boo As Fashion Models Sport Nooses And Hoods
Ananova ^
| 9-14-2002
Posted on 09/14/2002 4:39:00 PM PDT by blam
Spectators boo as fashion models sport nooses and hoods
Models sporting nooses, execution-style hoods and body-covering bandages triggered howls of protest and walkouts at Madrid's most prestigious fashion show.
Carrying rosaries or crucifixes, they paraded - and stumbled - to the sounds of a man's voice saying the Lord's Prayer, followed by a woman panting erotically and iron bars screeching as they opened and closed.
Spectators at the finale of the Pasarela Cibeles fashion show last night booed, whistled and called out to the vision-impaired models to guide them after some tripped.
Some in the crowd said the hoods recalled the burqa head-coverings that women in Afghanistan had to wear when the Taliban were in power.
The director of the week-long show, Cuca Solana, got up from her seat and ran backstage in a failed bid to persuade the models to stop the show.
The outfits were the work of fledgling designer David Delfin, who went out on stage afterward and put his hands together as if to ask forgiveness.
Speaking later to reporters, a visibly upset Delfin insisted he had not meant to trivialise repression against women.
He said he had got the idea from a painting by Rene Magritte in which two hooded lovers kiss.
"My mistake is that this was a theatrical concept and here in the Cibeles show there is no way to do a dress rehearsal," he said.
Still, Delfin defended the third fashion collection of his career as "the most feminine one I have ever designed."
Story filed: 13:48 Saturday 14th September 2002
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boo; fashion; hoods; models; nooses; spectators; sporting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Idiot!
1
posted on
09/14/2002 4:39:01 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Speaking later to reporters, a visibly upset Delfin insisted he had not meant to trivialise repression against women.
I believe him, he did not mean to "trivialise repression against women", he just meant to trivialise women.
To: blam
And the idiot models went along with it.
To: blam
Who's sicker: the people who think this stuff up, or the people who pay through the nose for the clothes designed by the people who think this stuff up?
To my mind it's a tie.
4
posted on
09/14/2002 4:46:30 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: blam
What stupid women. They should be buried up to their necks in sand and...
...hey, wait a minute...
</ sarcasm>
5
posted on
09/14/2002 4:49:39 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: blam
At least the audience made their point very clear. Euoros booing anything like this surprises me.
To: blam; dighton
Maybe they were just trying to get away with the low-budget 'Chelsea' models.
To: blam
"Carrying rosaries or crucifixes, they paraded - and stumbled - to the sounds of a man's voice saying the Lord's Prayer,"
I think it's another attack on Christianity. If they were wearing "burqas" there would have been Muslim chants. This should sober all of you.
8
posted on
09/14/2002 5:04:45 PM PDT
by
brat
To: jwh_Denver
" Euoros booing anything like this surprises me." Me too.
9
posted on
09/14/2002 5:40:26 PM PDT
by
blam
To: brat
That's right! I would be surprised if this "designer" is straight. We all know how homosexuals like to attack Christianity. To them, a Christian merely voicing disapproval of homosexuality is much worse than the physical attacks that Muslims perpetrate on homosexuals.
To: mewzilla
Have you ever noticed that, when it comes to liberals, you cannot make up anything to rival the idiocy they do in real life?
To: brat
I think it's another attack on Christianity. If they were wearing "burqas" there would have been Muslim chants. This should sober all of you. The thing to consider here is that to moral-liberal humanists, all religions are equal in that they are considered equally invalid and equally contemptible. Christianity is no different to them from Aztec human sacrifice or satanism.
To: blam
At least 90% of all women's fashions are ugly. The rest of it is pretty good.
13
posted on
09/14/2002 6:27:04 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: brat
"Carrying rosaries or crucifixes, they paraded - and stumbled - to the sounds of a man's voice saying the Lord's Prayer," I think it's another attack on Christianity.
I agree with you. I would have got up and left - wish they had!
14
posted on
09/14/2002 6:30:41 PM PDT
by
potlatch
To: Jimer
The last time that women's clothes looked good was when a Republican was in the White House. It is so refreshing to see a First Lady who actually lives up to the title "Lady."
To: Thinkin' Gal
Maybe they were just trying to get away with the low-budget 'Chelsea' models. Are you referring to the 'higb-beams' in the photo or did you miss that People magazine thread?
To: blam
www.davidelfin.com
17
posted on
09/15/2002 3:22:56 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: blam
Is this the same show that Noelle (I think) Bush was supposed to model in, but was too ill? I recall reading something about that last week.
18
posted on
09/15/2002 3:46:20 AM PDT
by
Textide
To: jwh_Denver
At least the audience made their point very clear. Euoros booing anything like this surprises me.
I think they were booing the fact that the woman were wearing crosses not that their heads were covered.
To: Jimer
I look at the stuff worn in these "fashion shows" and think "Yea, I'm gonna spend $4,000 and wear THAT thing out in public" or Halloween only comes once a year and it's ridiculous to think of spending that much money on an outfit that you're gonna have to explain to everyone who doesn't understand...Hell, I'm not sure I understand what it is".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson