To: Dog Gone
And I LOVE his honesty. But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it. That was my point. (Not that they'll succeed)
To: RobFromGa
I doubt that ever even enters his thinking. He expects the Democrats to always be trying to roast him for something.
I'm not even sure the ties to Saddam have been known for very long. But if Britain is about to reveal them, then Bush and Blair decided on this game plan last Saturday. The timing and manner was carefully planned for maximum effect.
56 posted on
09/14/2002 4:15:05 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: RobFromGa
But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it. Yes they would like to know what his next move is.
It would them plan their strategy!
To: RobFromGa
But he needs to have a reason for withholding this info or the Dems will try to roast him for it. Methinks he knows the identity of the infamous Congressional leaker.
Checkmate :-)
To: RobFromGa
Oh, please wake up. This is EXACTLY what he did with Al Queda if you remember. Bush never NEVER made the Al Queeda case. He let Tony do it with a 30 page document. I can still remember our upset press corps bitching endlessly about how they had to read everything in the English papers and couldn't create any "news" of their own. This is brilliant, again. Our socialist congress critters and communist press can NOT ataack Bush in any way and, yet, the Bush case gets made.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson