Skip to comments.
UN human rights chief quits with swipe at Washington
smh ^
| September 14 2002
Posted on 09/14/2002 7:17:53 AM PDT by Ranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
09/14/2002 7:17:53 AM PDT
by
Ranger
To: Ranger
"Instead, it has sought to put all the emphasis on combating terrorism and has not been fully upholding human rights standards. And that's having a ripple effect on other less democratic countries."Why is she worried about 'less democratic countries'?
To: Ranger
Just shows how clueless and backwards the UN is.
She's the best they've got and to have such a lack of perspective can't be easy. People have to actively work to be this dumb.
3
posted on
09/14/2002 7:27:55 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
To: Ranger
She cited the US's use of immigration laws to detain foreigners within its borders indefinitely, the racial profiling of people of Arab descent in searches[I say more rahter than less! Sooner rather than later!], and the prosecution of US citizens as enemy combatants, limiting their rights to legal representation. Enemy combatants are not US citizens. LOL!
To: Ranger
She also mentioned severe restrictions placed on the prisoners seized in Afghanistan and now being held at the US military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.If they gave her a female circumsion, would she even be aware that something was different?
To: Ranger
Well, regardless of WHY she's doing it, the important thing is - she quit... and that is good enough for me...
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
One more clintonoid stooge out the door. Let's hope the UN can find a replacement who understands what "human rights" means.
7
posted on
09/14/2002 7:35:22 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: tallhappy
A number of developing countries had copied anti-terrorism measures adopted by the US in the past year and had applied them to suppress political opponents, Mrs Robinson said. She mentioned new laws and political crackdowns in the name of fighting terrorism in Egypt, Zimbabwe and Pakistan, among others.We didn't force them to get more evil. Just because tyrants like Mugabe had GW Bush and invoke Bush's name when they commit unspeakable evil, that doesn't mean that Bush is doing anything wrong. In fact, their very hatred of GW Bush indicates he is on the right track.
This lady apparently isn't fit to raise a child. God help her children. "Junior, why were you driving 150 miles per hour?"
"Daddy speeds sometimes."
"True. I saw him driving at 57 mph yesterday. Time for a divorce! He drinks two beers every night. And that is why Sally is an alcholic today. Enough is enough!
Yes. Anger transference is a sign of a deranged mind.
To: Cicero
By coincidence, Mrs Robinson's term ended on Wednesday, September11. Once again, the Hand of the Lord was seen on 9-11. Let's slam the door in her rear on the way out. She's a nut case.
To: Ranger
Why don't they simply change their name to UN-ACLU. It is hard to see any difference. "Human Rights" to me has always been about tyrannical oppression, from Soviet Jews to Cambodians to Christians in Indonesia. It is not about administrative civil liberties, such as "detaining foreigners".
There are horrendous human rights disasters in Indonesia, China, Africa, Iraq, and most of the 3rd world. But Mary Robinson does not bother to mention those. She doesn't even mention how women are treated in Saudi Arabia.
Like everything else in the UN, it is about global Marxist politics, and nothing more.
To: Cicero
"In her last days of work, Mrs Robinson should validate that the United States is a leader in advocating for stronger human rights around the world," said Richard Grenell, spokesman for the US mission at the UN. Whack! Door hits rear end! LOL!
To: Ranger
UN human rights chief quits with swipe at Washington We will miss you, Mary.
Fear not though, your successor will be equally fond of trashing the U.S. while ignoring the true human rights violators of your beloved UN.
To: montag813
"The United States used to play a strong role in raising human rights concerns in its bilateral relations," she said. "Now [it] is more focused on getting coalition partners against terrorism and is not necessarily raising human rights." Can anyone think of a worse violation of human rights than terrorism? The death penalty? Is that worse? Gun rights? Is that what she's referring to? I think infanticide is worse, but something tells me she wouldn't agree. Oh I got it! Tree killing is worse! And not respecting the World Criminal Court, with it's wonderfully vague laws and denial of genuine fair trial guarantees. Who should be fair to US soldiers, after all?
To: Ranger
Perhaps Mary will now dedicate her life to bringing human rights to Saudi Arabia?
To: Ranger
Now, now, Mary, let's settle down and not have a tantrum. Does someone need a nap?
To: Ranger
On the occasion of her resignation, the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights chooses to take pot shots at the one country which was founded on the principle of human rights and has institutionalized and practiced the greatest respect for same.
Thereby demonstrating that the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights doesn't know squat about human rights...
16
posted on
09/14/2002 7:51:02 AM PDT
by
okie01
To: Ranger
F___ her. Just another stupid lib. She hates Israel and loves Mugabe. Western liberal guilt complex.
17
posted on
09/14/2002 7:51:11 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: What Is Ain't
Can you IMAGINE belonging to some international body that elevates Sudan and Red China above the US in the Commission of Human Rights? A place where parroting their drivel is more important than deeds. A place that allows Mugabe, Iraq, North Korea, and other monstrous regimes to stand up and lecture the world on how to be responsible leaders. How many janitors do they need to mop up the vomit? Not one! Those creeps don't even see the maggot infested feces coming out of peoples' mouths there. This witch, for instance, who thinks we are the bad guys, inspiring evil throughout the world when we ship medicine and food to Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, and anywhere else that might suffer from starvation and disease.
To: SubMareener
And, not a single word about the brute, Mugabe.
To: Ranger
It's a start. Now if we could jus get rid of the rest of 'em...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson