Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exodus
It is generally agreed that the Commander in Chief role gives the President power to repel attacks against the United States and makes him responsible for leading the armed forces.

The War Powers Resolution states that the President's powers as Commander-in-Chief to introduce U.S. forces into hostilities or imminent hostilities are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war; (2) specific statutory authorization; or (3) a national emergency created by an attack on the United States or its forces.

It requires the President in every possible instance to consult with Congress before introducing American armed forces into hostilities or imminent hostilities unless there has been a declaration of war or other specific congressional authorization.

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and

Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and

Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and

Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and

Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

233 posted on 09/14/2002 11:05:02 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution. (2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
# 233 by Luis Gonzalez
*************************

You keep pasting long articles that prove MY points, Luis.

"...Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

"...Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

Tell me, Luis, where is the Congressional approval to CONTINUE military operations?

That approval is required after 8 months of Presidential action, after which,

"...the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces..."

(SEC. 5. (b) of the War Powers Act)

247 posted on 09/14/2002 11:59:11 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson